<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webcams on Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/</link>
	<description>Hacking on GNOME, but with a healthy dose of C++</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:17:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 01:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Actually, I did a little bit of research beforehand, but I couldn&#039;t find a lot of really definitive information on exactly which models worked well (and you never know that the model they&#039;re selling now has the same chipset, etc. anyway, even if it has the same model number).  The reason I blogged about it was partly so that other people that came along looking for a webcam might have some better information about what works on linux.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But my main point was mainly the one that anonymous #2 made -- not too long ago I was editing X config by hand and struggling to get even basic usb stuff working, so the fact that I can just plug random stuff in and even some of it works feels pretty good.  And the point of this post was mostly to help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I did a little bit of research beforehand, but I couldn&#8217;t find a lot of really definitive information on exactly which models worked well (and you never know that the model they&#8217;re selling now has the same chipset, etc. anyway, even if it has the same model number).  The reason I blogged about it was partly so that other people that came along looking for a webcam might have some better information about what works on linux.</p>
<p>But my main point was mainly the one that anonymous #2 made &#8212; not too long ago I was editing X config by hand and struggling to get even basic usb stuff working, so the fact that I can just plug random stuff in and even some of it works feels pretty good.  And the point of this post was mostly to help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>yep, I&#039;ve to say I had the exact inverse experience. Also with a Quickcam Communicate, but at that time the driver had a bug and I had to fix the sources myself. But anyway, this is great to see how fast it evolves, I remember when I had to struggle to get a graphical display (understand plain X), and it wasn&#039;t that long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, I&#8217;ve to say I had the exact inverse experience. Also with a Quickcam Communicate, but at that time the driver had a bug and I had to fix the sources myself. But anyway, this is great to see how fast it evolves, I remember when I had to struggle to get a graphical display (understand plain X), and it wasn&#8217;t that long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Yes, the support for those has improved, especially thanks to that one French professor :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are however still a lot of cameras unsupported, you were still lucky if you didn&#039;t check beforehand. Especially couple of The sweetest webcams on the market are unsupported, those being the only a few genuinely HD models on the market. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s kind of sad that almost everything &quot;HD&quot; lacks (Ekiga for instance supports only post stamp sized video, lack of certain drivers, etc) behind on Linux, it would have been a great selling point to be superior on that area. Hopefully some day however...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the support for those has improved, especially thanks to that one French professor <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>There are however still a lot of cameras unsupported, you were still lucky if you didn&#8217;t check beforehand. Especially couple of The sweetest webcams on the market are unsupported, those being the only a few genuinely HD models on the market. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of sad that almost everything &#8220;HD&#8221; lacks (Ekiga for instance supports only post stamp sized video, lack of certain drivers, etc) behind on Linux, it would have been a great selling point to be superior on that area. Hopefully some day however&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/jjongsma/2007/05/25/webcams-on-linux/feed/ ) in 1.16804 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 9:54 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:54 pm UTC -->
