Comments on: Anjuta 2.26 Preview

By: pabs

pabs — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:16:44 +0000

Scintilla upstream are really quite opposed to the idea of a shared library, so static library or embedded code copies are your only options right now:

http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2488121

By: jhs

jhs — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:44:44 +0000

Well, not really. If would be easy if they just installed a shared library and a pkg-config file on linux. Shouldn’t be that difficult.

By: pabs

pabs — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:35:20 +0000

scintilla upstream says that there is a static library for scintilla, would that be useful to you?

By: Ignacius

Ignacius — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:09:56 +0000

Start page doesn’t seem to follow gtk’s theme…

By: aklapper

aklapper — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:56:33 +0000

Rocks. Even if I don’t code I’m impressed.

By: jhs

jhs — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:41:14 +0000

There is a vala plugin and it could be released if http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542920 was fixed.

By: Lee

Lee — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:24:00 +0000

Isn’t Vala planned to be in 2.26? No word on more Vala support integrated into Anjuta?

By: Anders

Anders — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:58:45 +0000

Pavel, I’m short of words. Anjuta is a perfect editor – and becoming a really great IDE. Please for the love of God, don’t throw that away! (And especially not in favor of Eclipse)

By: Pavel

Pavel — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:09:20 +0000

Would not we be better off adding autotools & pkg-config support to eclipse? I mean everything else is already there plus it is written in a more maintainable language…

By: pabs

pabs — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:03:05 +0000

I’ve filed a wishlist request about the scintilla shared library idea in the scintilla feature tracker:

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2488121&group_id=2439&atid=352439