http://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/2009/04/25/please-dont-fork-and-esspecially-dont-fork-forks/ Blog of Johannes Schmid Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:22:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/2009/04/25/please-dont-fork-and-esspecially-dont-fork-forks/comment-page-1/#comment-564 Ignacius Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:25:29 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/?p=170#comment-564 I think gtk should have a docking library. Probably many applications would use it not only monodevelop, anjuta or inkscape. There are some apps which would probably be using it because it makes sense such as gimp, gedit, xchat, glade, devhelp or even brasero or epiphany. I'm sure many of them just don't use it because there isn't a very standard way to use a docking widget. I think gtk should have a docking library. Probably many applications would use it not only monodevelop, anjuta or inkscape. There are some apps which would probably be using it because it makes sense such as gimp, gedit, xchat, glade, devhelp or even brasero or epiphany. I’m sure many of them just don’t use it because there isn’t a very standard way to use a docking widget.

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/2009/04/25/please-dont-fork-and-esspecially-dont-fork-forks/comment-page-1/#comment-563 Robin Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:52:07 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/?p=170#comment-563 Maybe you could change the description from "GNOME docking library" to "Gtk+ docking library" then, to make it clear that it doesn't depend on GNOME libraries? Maybe you could change the description from “GNOME docking library” to “Gtk+ docking library” then, to make it clear that it doesn’t depend on GNOME libraries?

]]>