<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jürg Billeter's blog &#187; Tracker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/juergbi/tag/tracker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/juergbi</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:35:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New SPARQL Parser merged</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/juergbi/2009/08/14/new-sparql-parser-merged/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/juergbi/2009/08/14/new-sparql-parser-merged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juergbi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/juergbi/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up to now, Tracker has used Rasqal to parse SPARQL queries received from applications. We imported a copy of Rasqal into Tracker&#8217;s source tree as we use some SPARQL extensions that are not yet fully implemented in Rasqal upstream. For the last couple of weeks I&#8217;ve been writing a new SPARQL parser, a hand-written recursive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up to now, <a href="http://projects.gnome.org/tracker/">Tracker</a> has used <a href="http://librdf.org/rasqal/">Rasqal</a> to parse <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/">SPARQL</a> queries received from applications. We imported a copy of Rasqal into Tracker&#8217;s source tree as we use some SPARQL extensions that are not yet fully implemented in Rasqal upstream. For the last couple of weeks I&#8217;ve been writing a new SPARQL parser, a hand-written recursive descent parser.</p>
<p>The motivation was to speed up (large) queries and to fix a few corner cases with OPTIONAL graph patterns that Rasqal gets wrong. Rasqal does not perform very well for large queries as it always builds a full abstract syntax tree of the query, even if it&#8217;s a very simple but long INSERT statement. The hand-written parser processes queries on the fly, trying to keep only as much state around as necessary.</p>
<p>The new parser has now been merged into master and should improve our SPARQL support in both speed and conformance. We&#8217;ve tested it with test cases from DAWG and it appears to work at least as well as the old parser, but I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ve missed some bugs, so let us know if you find any issues with SPARQL in Tracker master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/juergbi/2009/08/14/new-sparql-parser-merged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/juergbi/tag/tracker/feed/ ) in 1.17002 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 9:43 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 10:43 pm UTC -->
