<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Karsten Bräckelmann &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae</link>
	<description>Open Thoughts -- Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:22:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Invasion of the Forums</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2009/07/28/invasion-of-the-forums/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2009/07/28/invasion-of-the-forums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kbrae</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So recently, some $user entity joined a particular mailing-list. And starts asking questions. Nothing wrong with that! Granted, quite a cannonade of questions. Sure, we can handle that. Showing off a profound lack of understanding what he&#8217;s dealing with. Right, we are patient, usually, and can explain (again) or point to specific doc sections (yet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So recently, some $user entity joined a particular mailing-list. And starts asking questions. Nothing wrong with that!</p>
<p>Granted, quite a cannonade of questions. Sure, we can handle that. Showing off a profound lack of understanding what he&#8217;s dealing with. Right, we are patient, usually, and can explain (again) or point to specific doc sections (yet again). Asking quite dumb questions, often with a confrontational undertone. This is where it gets annoying.</p>
<p>Today, that new kid in the kindergarten came to an obvious conclusion. We need a proper forum! This current $thingy is unberable. And he would even provide the forum. No, wait, he already got a domain&#8230; Mind you, the $thingy he uses is a popular &#8220;forum frontend for mailing-lists&#8221;. I&#8217;ll try hard not to mention the name.</p>
<p>So he uses a third-party forum to access a mailing-list, because he can&#8217;t handle the mail. Can&#8217;t handle the forum either, obviously. And takes the forum front-end&#8217;s flaws as evidence a mailing-list is unusable, and we need a forum. This logic strikes me.</p>
<p>Did I mention the list&#8217;s topic is about <em>email</em>, quite in-depth, filtering, from an <em>admin</em>&#8216;s perspective?</p>
<p>So he got his shiny new domain. I guess he&#8217;ll sit there forever, eye-balling his precious forum, constantly reloading the gazillion threads he started to see if anyone answered his questions. He forgot <em>one</em> thing, though &#8212; the knowledgeable folks who actually can answer his questions, and properly maintain the forum.</p>
<p>On to more productive things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2009/07/28/invasion-of-the-forums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2.17.3 is OUT</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2006/12/06/2173-is-out/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2006/12/06/2173-is-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kbrae</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2006/12/06/2173-is-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are pleased to announce the release of GARNOME 2.17.3 &#8212; ahead of the official GNOME release, which is expected to be announced soon (read hours). After constant updating, tweaking and testing, especially the last 2 days, the actual release was smooth and quickly done. Get the code while it&#8217;s hot, and fix (ok, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are pleased to announce the release of GARNOME 2.17.3 &#8212; ahead of the official GNOME release, which is expected to be announced soon (read hours). After constant updating, tweaking and testing, especially the last 2 days, the actual release was smooth and quickly done.
<p>Get the code while it&#8217;s hot, and fix (ok, or report) bugs before anyone else does. Get the love now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2006/12/06/2173-is-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>xsnow ?!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2006/12/05/xsnow/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2006/12/05/xsnow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kbrae</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2006/12/05/xsnow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave, you are so right, xsnow is a great app for the holiday season (as is my &#8220;special&#8221; music CD dated 1994, but that would be a different story). I first saw this years ago on my account in a Sparc Station pool. We have been limited to using OLVWM, but the admins where kind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, you are <a href="http://davelargo.blogspot.com/2006/12/sometimes-its-just-bling.html">so right</a>, xsnow is a great app for the holiday season (as is my &#8220;special&#8221; music CD dated 1994, but that would be a different story).
<p>I first saw this years ago on my account in a Sparc Station pool. We have been limited to using OLVWM, but the admins where kind enough to add xsnow by default to the session early Dec. Nice surprise. I quickly got that for my own machines&#8230;
<p>However, you probably do recall correctly, and there is an issue with running xsnow on a GNOME Desktop. At least it has been last time I checked. The issue is, that the snowflakes properly work with the background image, but cause &#8220;severe damage&#8221; to the icons on your Desktop. A snowflake falling right through these icons leave a trail behind, re-rendering the background image, instead of the icon. Just a couple of minutes, and you won&#8217;t see any icon unless you &#8220;wipe off the snow&#8221; with the mouse or, even better, a larg-ish window.
<p>I spent some time hacking a custom version (2 years ago?), implementing some code from xpenguins. It kind of worked, and supported command line tweaking, but anything close to a smooth re-rendering appearance really hogged my CPU.
<p>From your screenshot, it looks like there are no Desktop icons. So that would be the reason, why it now &#8220;works&#8221; for you running GNOME, I guess. Or maybe there finally *is* a fix? I need to check that&#8230; <tt> <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </tt>
<p>(Unfortunately you still won&#8217;t see this on p.g.o, so I am going to poke you on IRC instead.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/2006/12/05/xsnow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/kbrae/category/general/feed/ ) in 1.20695 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:17 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:17 am UTC -->
