<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EOG statubar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/</link>
	<description>The mustache, the beard and the smile: everything together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Federico Mena-Quintero</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico Mena-Quintero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is very nice!&lt;p/&gt;1. Non-prographers don&#039;t care about exposure, but if it takes so little space in the status bar, I wouldn&#039;t even put an option to hide it.  It&#039;s harmless info, just like when your camera displays it right before taking the picture.&lt;p/&gt;2. Yes.&lt;p/&gt;3. Simplified.&lt;p/&gt;4. Nothing.  It&#039;s beautiful the way you presented it.  Maybe show the uncompressed size - graphic arts nerds like to see that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is very nice!
<p />1. Non-prographers don&#8217;t care about exposure, but if it takes so little space in the status bar, I wouldn&#8217;t even put an option to hide it.  It&#8217;s harmless info, just like when your camera displays it right before taking the picture.
<p />2. Yes.
<p />3. Simplified.
<p />4. Nothing.  It&#8217;s beautiful the way you presented it.  Maybe show the uncompressed size &#8211; graphic arts nerds like to see that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Full size screenshot isn&#039;t available without a login. Flickr, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full size screenshot isn&#8217;t available without a login. Flickr, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gil forcada</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>gil forcada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>1. same as federico&lt;br/&gt;2. if not there, where?&lt;br/&gt;3. get de locale info of format time it could be the best i18n friendly way ;)&lt;br/&gt;4. in status bar nothing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. same as federico<br />2. if not there, where?<br />3. get de locale info of format time it could be the best i18n friendly way ;)<br />4. in status bar nothing :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I found that i would alot of the time go and check the dimentions of pictures, many other apps display the size there and its much less of a hassle. &lt;p/&gt;as for the exif values they are good but the position looks weird to me, most end users wouldnt care about the information because they probably have a point and shoot with little manual settings, but for some people it would be very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that i would alot of the time go and check the dimentions of pictures, many other apps display the size there and its much less of a hassle.
<p />as for the exif values they are good but the position looks weird to me, most end users wouldnt care about the information because they probably have a point and shoot with little manual settings, but for some people it would be very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Rocha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Rocha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>@Sam, the screenshot is available now.&lt;p/&gt;@Casey, weird position? What do you mean? I think the exif values should be separated from the general info in some way to reduce the visual noise and not confuse the user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sam, the screenshot is available now.
<p />@Casey, weird position? What do you mean? I think the exif values should be separated from the general info in some way to reduce the visual noise and not confuse the user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I like it! How about making the statusbar content click able, like a context menu, for quick customization.&lt;br/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it! How about making the statusbar content click able, like a context menu, for quick customization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbas Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Abbas Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Perfect, i just hope you have an option to turn it off in view (view -&gt; Exif Data). I also hope this is turned off by default since most users don&#039;t need/understand this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect, i just hope you have an option to turn it off in view (view -&gt; Exif Data). I also hope this is turned off by default since most users don&#8217;t need/understand this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>MattW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Being able to turn it off would just be a pointless extra preference. Users see this information when they use their cameras and if they don&#039;t know what it means it&#039;s harmless. They&#039;ll probably figure out what the date is, and the rest can be briefly explained in the eog help system if they get really curious.&lt;p/&gt;It&#039;s just empty space on the status bar anyway, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to seriously confuse anybody to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being able to turn it off would just be a pointless extra preference. Users see this information when they use their cameras and if they don&#8217;t know what it means it&#8217;s harmless. They&#8217;ll probably figure out what the date is, and the rest can be briefly explained in the eog help system if they get really curious.
<p />It&#8217;s just empty space on the status bar anyway, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to seriously confuse anybody to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richi Plana</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Richi Plana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s missing? How about the Lat-Long coordinates as well as heading when the picture was taken? ;) One can only hope. Once the OpenMoko phone gets released with a camera, we plan on putting that in the EXIF info. Maemo should have something similar.&lt;p/&gt;Can you make it such that clicking on the status bar would pop up additional EXIF information? Like if I click on the exposure summary, the rest of the picture conditions would appear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s missing? How about the Lat-Long coordinates as well as heading when the picture was taken? ;) One can only hope. Once the OpenMoko phone gets released with a camera, we plan on putting that in the EXIF info. Maemo should have something similar.
<p />Can you make it such that clicking on the status bar would pop up additional EXIF information? Like if I click on the exposure summary, the rest of the picture conditions would appear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: François</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>François</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/eog-statubar/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Great, that&#039;s something I&#039;m often looking at! The focal length would be the cherry on the cake :) With all those information, you have basically all the settings chosen to take the photo. that&#039;s very useful for poor photographers like me who tries to understand how a pic was taken.&lt;p/&gt;And please stop with your samples, last time your wife, now a dessert she probably prepares for you, do you REALLY want us all jealous? Are you happy now? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, that&#8217;s something I&#8217;m often looking at! The focal length would be the cherry on the cake :) With all those information, you have basically all the settings chosen to take the photo. that&#8217;s very useful for poor photographers like me who tries to understand how a pic was taken.
<p />And please stop with your samples, last time your wife, now a dessert she probably prepares for you, do you REALLY want us all jealous? Are you happy now? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
