Comments on: Selection bytes http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/ The mustache, the beard and the smile: everything together. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:31:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Jeff Walden http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-227 Jeff Walden Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-227 I don't understand the checkboxes. What do they do, and why are they there? Do they only show up when a selection is made, or are they always present?<p/>Also, wasn't part of the point to make the selection contiguous?<p/>Food for thought -- I'll withhold substantive judgments until this has gone through some iterations. I don’t understand the checkboxes. What do they do, and why are they there? Do they only show up when a selection is made, or are they always present?

Also, wasn’t part of the point to make the selection contiguous?

Food for thought — I’ll withhold substantive judgments until this has gone through some iterations.

]]> By: Lucas Rocha http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-228 Lucas Rocha Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-228 @Jeff,<p/>The checkboxes are not present in the default GtkIconView. I took this screenshot from the GtkIconView test program in Gtk source tree. They're there just for testing purposes.<p/>It seems that even with spacing zero, there's still some blank space between cells. I'll investigate this too. @Jeff,

The checkboxes are not present in the default GtkIconView. I took this screenshot from the GtkIconView test program in Gtk source tree. They’re there just for testing purposes.

It seems that even with spacing zero, there’s still some blank space between cells. I’ll investigate this too.

]]> By: Spiff http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-229 Spiff Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-229 Also, don't forget that we demand rounded borders.<br/>Round borders are a must!<br/>Plz refer to Mr tigert's mockup attached to the previous post for reference.<br/> Also, don’t forget that we demand rounded borders.
Round borders are a must!
Plz refer to Mr tigert’s mockup attached to the previous post for reference.

]]> By: Abbas Khan http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-230 Abbas Khan Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-230 i just hope it ends up looking like the mockup, ALSO rounded borders are needed, it won't look good w/o it. What are those wierd check marks, i hope they won't be there. i just hope it ends up looking like the mockup, ALSO rounded borders are needed, it won’t look good w/o it. What are those wierd check marks, i hope they won’t be there.

]]> By: mike http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-231 mike Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-231 That looks amazing!<p/>Hopefully it will be in GTK very fast ;) That looks amazing!

Hopefully it will be in GTK very fast ;)

]]> By: erik http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-232 erik Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-232 There shouldn't be that white thin line between selected items.. Lose it, it'll look sweeter when they selection is combined and has rounded corners. Also the gradient is still missing :-( There shouldn’t be that white thin line between selected items.. Lose it, it’ll look sweeter when they selection is combined and has rounded corners. Also the gradient is still missing :-(

]]> By: asldkjjlk http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-233 asldkjjlk Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-233 The white lines definitely have to go. I also wonder how this works with rubberbanding. The white lines definitely have to go. I also wonder how this works with rubberbanding.

]]> By: Matt http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-234 Matt Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-234 The other thing that's nice about the mockup (but not here) is that the selection colour is not just overlaid on top of the icons, it's behind it. The other thing that’s nice about the mockup (but not here) is that the selection colour is not just overlaid on top of the icons, it’s behind it.

]]> By: tm http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/comment-page-1/#comment-235 tm Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2007/02/03/selection-bytes/#comment-235 Nice work! It's funny how word "must" appears in comments.<br/>I guess for this moment there is nothing much to comment unless one patches his gnome and gets feeling of this! Nice work! It’s funny how word “must” appears in comments.
I guess for this moment there is nothing much to comment unless one patches his gnome and gets feeling of this!

]]>