<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME Roadmap &#8211; Information requests for 2.24 sent!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/</link>
	<description>The mustache, the beard and the smile: everything together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aklapper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>aklapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/#comment-734</guid>
		<description>@ethana2: this is nothing that the roadmap gang deals with, but the maintainers themselves. the roadmap gang is to *collect the plans of the developers*, not to define plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/#comment-730">ethana2</a>: this is nothing that the roadmap gang deals with, but the maintainers themselves. the roadmap gang is to *collect the plans of the developers*, not to define plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethana2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521131
...are they ready to consider something crazy like that, or should that wait until they&#039;re going to break all the ABI&#039;s anyway for 3.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521131" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521131</a><br />
&#8230;are they ready to consider something crazy like that, or should that wait until they&#8217;re going to break all the ABI&#8217;s anyway for 3.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethana2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/03/18/gnome-roadmap-information-requests-for-224-sent/#comment-729</guid>
		<description>See if anyone in the roadmap group is crazy enough to consider something like this:  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521131

^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See if anyone in the roadmap group is crazy enough to consider something like this:  <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521131" rel="nofollow">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521131</a></p>
<p>^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
