<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GNOME 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/</link>
	<description>The mustache, the beard and the smile: everything together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Socceroos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Socceroos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-890</guid>
		<description>@Tim

I believe the logic behind this is a major technology overhaul &#039;underneath the hood&#039; (ie, the API&#039;s).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim</p>
<p>I believe the logic behind this is a major technology overhaul &#8216;underneath the hood&#8217; (ie, the API&#8217;s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-889</guid>
		<description>and GNOME 2.40 == GNOME 4.0? What is the logic behind this beside increasing the version-number?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and GNOME 2.40 == GNOME 4.0? What is the logic behind this beside increasing the version-number?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iGraphiX Blog &#124; Gnome 3.0 Plans</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>iGraphiX Blog &#124; Gnome 3.0 Plans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-888</guid>
		<description>[...] their plans for gtk+ 3.0; immediately after, the Gnome release team announced their plans for Gnome 2.30 to be changed into Gnome 3.0. This would mean a release date a year and a half to a year in the future. Details are short at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their plans for gtk+ 3.0; immediately after, the Gnome release team announced their plans for Gnome 2.30 to be changed into Gnome 3.0. This would mean a release date a year and a half to a year in the future. Details are short at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux para Seres Humanos &#187; Anunciado GNOME 3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux para Seres Humanos &#187; Anunciado GNOME 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>[...] corriendo muchos rumores por Internet pero una de las dos cosas que se sabe oficialmente es que GNOME 2.3 se renombrará a GNOME 3. Por otro lado continuarán con su ciclo de publicación [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] corriendo muchos rumores por Internet pero una de las dos cosas que se sabe oficialmente es que GNOME 2.3 se renombrará a GNOME 3. Por otro lado continuarán con su ciclo de publicación [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I’m not anti-social; I’m just not user friendly &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gnome 2.3 = Gnome 3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>I’m not anti-social; I’m just not user friendly &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gnome 2.3 = Gnome 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-883</guid>
		<description>[...] corriendo muchos rumores por Internet pero una de las dos cosas que se sabe oficialmente es que GNOME 2.3 se renombrará a GNOME 3. Por otro lado continuarán con su ciclo de publicación [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] corriendo muchos rumores por Internet pero una de las dos cosas que se sabe oficialmente es que GNOME 2.3 se renombrará a GNOME 3. Por otro lado continuarán con su ciclo de publicación [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobCFC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>BobCFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-882</guid>
		<description>Hope we have lots of people like Aza Raskin 

I vote for simple and cloud-aware


.... and proper gnome icons with borders not like oxygen icons, which while pretty, are unreadable at 16x16</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope we have lots of people like Aza Raskin </p>
<p>I vote for simple and cloud-aware</p>
<p>&#8230;. and proper gnome icons with borders not like oxygen icons, which while pretty, are unreadable at 16&#215;16</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domenico Lofù Official Site &#187; GNOME 3.0 uscirà nel 2010</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Domenico Lofù Official Site &#187; GNOME 3.0 uscirà nel 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-881</guid>
		<description>[...] prime attendibili indiscrezioni, la fantomatica versione 3 di GNOME potrebbe uscire al posto della 2.30, e cioè, calcolando il [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] prime attendibili indiscrezioni, la fantomatica versione 3 di GNOME potrebbe uscire al posto della 2.30, e cioè, calcolando il [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v1ncent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>v1ncent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-880</guid>
		<description>I only hope that GTK+ gets BETTER, i want to see the BEST program&#039;s GUI ever created... 
To be clear: better than OS X GUIs (simple, nice, productive, good looking).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only hope that GTK+ gets BETTER, i want to see the BEST program&#8217;s GUI ever created&#8230;<br />
To be clear: better than OS X GUIs (simple, nice, productive, good looking).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interstellar Medium: the Free Software carnival &#187; Free Software Carnival: 5 – 11 July</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Interstellar Medium: the Free Software carnival &#187; Free Software Carnival: 5 – 11 July</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-879</guid>
		<description>[...] Lucas Rocha gave a talk on GNOME 3.0 plans at GUADEC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lucas Rocha gave a talk on GNOME 3.0 plans at GUADEC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Plans for Gtk+/GNOME 3.0 surfaced Salatti.NET</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Plans for Gtk+/GNOME 3.0 surfaced Salatti.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 06:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/lucasr/2008/07/10/gnome-30/#comment-878</guid>
		<description>[...] news flash came right from GUADEC today: there will be a GNOME 3.0, and it will break the libs. Most news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news flash came right from GUADEC today: there will be a GNOME 3.0, and it will break the libs. Most news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
