<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stateless Linux Cached Client</title>
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/markmc/2006/06/08/stateless-linux-cached-client/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/markmc/2006/06/08/stateless-linux-cached-client/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/markmc/2006/06/08/stateless-linux-cached-client/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Is there any reason why the archive of stateless-list is protected? Wouldn't mind checking those out, without the commitment of a subscription..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any reason why the archive of stateless-list is protected? Wouldn&#8217;t mind checking those out, without the commitment of a subscription..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McLoughlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/markmc/2006/06/08/stateless-linux-cached-client/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McLoughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/markmc/2006/06/08/stateless-linux-cached-client/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I don't think there's a reason, no. I've poked the list owner about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a reason, no. I&#8217;ve poked the list owner about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
