<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: By popular request</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/</link>
	<description>"Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios."</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henrique</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Also...

"Request: Antialias the rounded corners." +1

At least some drawing method, primitive, or option to the Metacity XML theme file. Something like  would be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Request: Antialias the rounded corners.&#8221; +1</p>
<p>At least some drawing method, primitive, or option to the Metacity XML theme file. Something like  would be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrique</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Perfectness is on the details.

Yep, thats cute. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfectness is on the details.</p>
<p>Yep, thats cute. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luca Ferretti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca Ferretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Iain, another note about the shadows: it seems that kwin for KDE4 is using a texture to draw the shadow. In a recent change, they commited an updated texture using a gaussian blur instead of a linear gradient. This should make the shadow more  realistic. 

From &lt;a href="http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/kwin/effects/data/shadow-texture.png?view=log" rel="nofollow"&gt;KDE svn log&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iain, another note about the shadows: it seems that kwin for KDE4 is using a texture to draw the shadow. In a recent change, they commited an updated texture using a gaussian blur instead of a linear gradient. This should make the shadow more  realistic. </p>
<p>From <a href="http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/kwin/effects/data/shadow-texture.png?view=log" rel="nofollow">KDE svn log</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luca Ferretti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca Ferretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Great! This drop shadow for panel is definitively better :-)

I can confirm the drop shadow only on the first dragged icon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! This drop shadow for panel is definitively better :-)</p>
<p>I can confirm the drop shadow only on the first dragged icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>WOW! great work! 

I just checked out your branch from gnome svn and after one fast compile i got it working. It does quite better in performance vs compiz. My problems with compiz were related with scrolling, it was unusable, as the application stopped scrolling quite after i released my mouse wheel. With metacity there's a lag there also, but it's far more responsive. It seems to consume double the cpu in comparation with plain metacity.

This is great i can run awn now with out the need of the bloated compiz-fusion! :P

Also, if you are open to opinions, i dont like the black border on the windows when you do the ALT-tab.

(note i tested this on my Thinkpad t60 with an ati X1300)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! great work! </p>
<p>I just checked out your branch from gnome svn and after one fast compile i got it working. It does quite better in performance vs compiz. My problems with compiz were related with scrolling, it was unusable, as the application stopped scrolling quite after i released my mouse wheel. With metacity there&#8217;s a lag there also, but it&#8217;s far more responsive. It seems to consume double the cpu in comparation with plain metacity.</p>
<p>This is great i can run awn now with out the need of the bloated compiz-fusion! :P</p>
<p>Also, if you are open to opinions, i dont like the black border on the windows when you do the ALT-tab.</p>
<p>(note i tested this on my Thinkpad t60 with an ati X1300)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>luca: yeah, I had to revert the panel drop shadows over windows thing, it had a weird bug in it that I've not found yet. I've not touched tooltips shadows, and although it was working for me, I seem to have a drop shadow only on the first icon I drag, all other drags have no shadows. I'll look into that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>luca: yeah, I had to revert the panel drop shadows over windows thing, it had a weird bug in it that I&#8217;ve not found yet. I&#8217;ve not touched tooltips shadows, and although it was working for me, I seem to have a drop shadow only on the first icon I drag, all other drags have no shadows. I&#8217;ll look into that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luca Cavalli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Luca Cavalli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hi Iain,
great work on this side of Metacity, thanks. I'm running svn revision 3445 but I still have drop shadows on dragging icons and tooltips (did you remove tooltips shadow too?) and the dropping shadow of panel is drawn over windows. Any idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Iain,<br />
great work on this side of Metacity, thanks. I&#8217;m running svn revision 3445 but I still have drop shadows on dragging icons and tooltips (did you remove tooltips shadow too?) and the dropping shadow of panel is drawn over windows. Any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Jakub: Actually, someone else pointed out to me today that that was how OSX did it, by using a smaller shadow. I'll look into doing that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jakub: Actually, someone else pointed out to me today that that was how OSX did it, by using a smaller shadow. I&#8217;ll look into doing that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakub Steiner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Steiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Amazing stuff. I would also suggest to make the shadow of the unfocused windows much much more subtle (I'd actually drop it completely, but I'm an extremist). That way it aids showing which window is focused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing stuff. I would also suggest to make the shadow of the unfocused windows much much more subtle (I&#8217;d actually drop it completely, but I&#8217;m an extremist). That way it aids showing which window is focused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rui</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Rui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2007/11/26/by-popular-request/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>*Two* +1 == *Three* :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Two* +1 == *Three* :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
