<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Release wrangler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/02/04/release-wrangler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/02/04/release-wrangler/</link>
	<description>"Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/02/04/release-wrangler/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 04:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/02/04/release-wrangler/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Oh, goodness-- no, I hadn&#039;t. Looking at that page, I don&#039;t think it does &lt;em&gt;quite&lt;/em&gt; what release-wrangler does: m.p appears to have a bunch of options for maintaining things at other stages than release time, whereas r-w is just a tool to blast through a release; m.p attempts to figure out the bugs that have been fixed from Bugzilla, whereas r-w just trusts that you kept the ChangeLog up to date. I think both scripts have things that they do differently or better, and I wonder whether they&#039;re close enough that it would be helpful to collaborate. I&#039;ll get in touch with Martyn Russell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, goodness&#8211; no, I hadn&#8217;t. Looking at that page, I don&#8217;t think it does <em>quite</em> what release-wrangler does: m.p appears to have a bunch of options for maintaining things at other stages than release time, whereas r-w is just a tool to blast through a release; m.p attempts to figure out the bugs that have been fixed from Bugzilla, whereas r-w just trusts that you kept the ChangeLog up to date. I think both scripts have things that they do differently or better, and I wonder whether they&#8217;re close enough that it would be helpful to collaborate. I&#8217;ll get in touch with Martyn Russell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stowers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/02/04/release-wrangler/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 03:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/02/04/release-wrangler/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Have you seen maintainer.py?

http://developer.imendio.com/projects/misc/maintainer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen maintainer.py?</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.imendio.com/projects/misc/maintainer" rel="nofollow">http://developer.imendio.com/projects/misc/maintainer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
