<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Metacity themes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/</link>
	<description>"Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sorpigal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorpigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>@Trochee

You&#039;d be correct in your guessing. Wikipedia confirms (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WindowShade), which is what I remember as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Trochee</p>
<p>You&#8217;d be correct in your guessing. Wikipedia confirms (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WindowShade)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WindowShade)</a>, which is what I remember as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: …for the adult in you &#187; Justifying window titles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>…for the adult in you &#187; Justifying window titles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>[...] …for the adult in you &#8220;Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios.&#8221;   Skip to content         &#171; Understanding Metacity themes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] …for the adult in you &#8220;Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios.&#8221;   Skip to content         &laquo; Understanding Metacity themes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Benjamin: Good plan.  This should certainly live on lgo in the long term, but in order to receive comments it rather needs to be blogged first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin: Good plan.  This should certainly live on lgo in the long term, but in order to receive comments it rather needs to be blogged first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 10:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>There is a copy of Glynns introduction on live.gnome.org at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeArt/Tutorials/MetacityThemes. Now I am wondering how to move forward with the documentation. We could use the wiki or some other place, but I think it would be good if the documentation is not scattered around too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a copy of Glynns introduction on live.gnome.org at <a href="http://live.gnome.org/GnomeArt/Tutorials/MetacityThemes" rel="nofollow">http://live.gnome.org/GnomeArt/Tutorials/MetacityThemes</a>. Now I am wondering how to move forward with the documentation. We could use the wiki or some other place, but I think it would be good if the documentation is not scattered around too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Screwtape: I am kicking myself here, because of course you are right.  I have amended the text accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screwtape: I am kicking myself here, because of course you are right.  I have amended the text accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screwtape</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Screwtape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 01:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It is not immediately appear to me how the toggled version of maximize is generated, though I suppose I must have known at some point.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Looking at a theme I have here, for maximized windows the &#039;maximize&#039; button is told to use draw_ops=&quot;restore_button&quot; rather than draw_ops=&quot;maximize_button&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It is not immediately appear to me how the toggled version of maximize is generated, though I suppose I must have known at some point.</p></blockquote>
<p>Looking at a theme I have here, for maximized windows the &#8216;maximize&#8217; button is told to use draw_ops=&#8221;restore_button&#8221; rather than draw_ops=&#8221;maximize_button&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 22:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>I always guessed that &quot;shaded&quot; is called that because of the &quot;windowshade&quot; analogy, you know, the springloaded roller-blind that rolls up and out of the way when tugged sharply down.  Hence &quot;[window]shaded&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always guessed that &#8220;shaded&#8221; is called that because of the &#8220;windowshade&#8221; analogy, you know, the springloaded roller-blind that rolls up and out of the way when tugged sharply down.  Hence &#8220;[window]shaded&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ᛏᚦ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Understanding Metacity themes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>ᛏᚦ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Understanding Metacity themes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/05/30/themes/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>[...] saying Metacity&#8217;s themes were under-explained, so I&#8217;ve spent a few days now writing the start of an explanation. I didn&#8217;t post it here because it&#8217;s a Metacity thing and belongs on the Metacity blog, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saying Metacity&#8217;s themes were under-explained, so I&#8217;ve spent a few days now writing the start of an explanation. I didn&#8217;t post it here because it&#8217;s a Metacity thing and belongs on the Metacity blog, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
