<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008-11-11: fullscreen, focus and so on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/11/12/martinmas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/11/12/martinmas/</link>
	<description>"Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2008/11/12/martinmas/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=175#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Vectacity sounds great, if I&#039;m honest I think GTK should be resolution independent by going the vector route and if metacity leads the way then I&#039;m all for it.

RE: Window matching - I did see the long list of apps with unique IDs etc, but surely sloppy window matching is better than none? I&#039;ve seen a lot of people with dedicated desktops for certain &#039;roles&#039; such as messaging/email - web - development - music and these all require a unique set of applications. Using KWin it&#039;s trivial to just &#039;sticky&#039; to a certain desktop and when closer/reopened will open where requested. I think that&#039;s the only thing that metacity misses out on at the moment for usability - stickiness/state.

If you put it in and people use it, great. If not, hey you&#039;ve done your part. People can patch any offending apps or you can sloppily match for those cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vectacity sounds great, if I&#8217;m honest I think GTK should be resolution independent by going the vector route and if metacity leads the way then I&#8217;m all for it.</p>
<p>RE: Window matching &#8211; I did see the long list of apps with unique IDs etc, but surely sloppy window matching is better than none? I&#8217;ve seen a lot of people with dedicated desktops for certain &#8216;roles&#8217; such as messaging/email &#8211; web &#8211; development &#8211; music and these all require a unique set of applications. Using KWin it&#8217;s trivial to just &#8217;sticky&#8217; to a certain desktop and when closer/reopened will open where requested. I think that&#8217;s the only thing that metacity misses out on at the moment for usability &#8211; stickiness/state.</p>
<p>If you put it in and people use it, great. If not, hey you&#8217;ve done your part. People can patch any offending apps or you can sloppily match for those cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
