Comments on: Sorry for the silence http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/02/sorry-for-the-silence/ "Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios." Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:08:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Thomas Thurman http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/02/sorry-for-the-silence/comment-page-1/#comment-761 Thomas Thurman Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:21:32 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=336#comment-761 @Hobosic: All the photos posted on this blog are licenced under Creative Commons and none of them are original to us. The attribution at the foot of each post says where they come from. Most of them are taken from Flickr. If you click the photo it will take you to the original page. @Hobosic:

All the photos posted on this blog are licenced under Creative Commons and none of them are original to us. The attribution at the foot of each post says where they come from. Most of them are taken from Flickr. If you click the photo it will take you to the original page.

]]> By: Hobosic http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/02/sorry-for-the-silence/comment-page-1/#comment-760 Hobosic Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:13:44 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=336#comment-760 Hello, Admin. Can I take a photo from your blog? Of course, i will place a backlink to source. Thanks. Yours Hobosic Hello, Admin.
Can I take a photo from your blog?
Of course, i will place a backlink to source.
Thanks.
Yours Hobosic

]]> By: Thomas Thurman http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/02/sorry-for-the-silence/comment-page-1/#comment-759 Thomas Thurman Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:03:51 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=336#comment-759 That does seem to make a difference. Thank you. That does seem to make a difference. Thank you.

]]> By: Olivier Samyn http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/02/sorry-for-the-silence/comment-page-1/#comment-758 Olivier Samyn Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:22:23 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=336#comment-758 I just had a look at your patch... Maybe avoiding the switch statement in the evaluation loop will optimize your code. Using an array of function pointers or some gcc extension like [1] should do it... If I only had time to test this... [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.3/gcc/Labels-as-Values.html I just had a look at your patch…
Maybe avoiding the switch statement in the evaluation loop will optimize your code.

Using an array of function pointers or some gcc extension like [1] should do it…

If I only had time to test this…

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.3/gcc/Labels-as-Values.html

]]>