<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: meta_warning() and dialogue boxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/28/meta_warning-and-dialogue-boxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/28/meta_warning-and-dialogue-boxes/</link>
	<description>"Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody sees that?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/28/meta_warning-and-dialogue-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody sees that?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=404#comment-809</guid>
		<description>In the screenshot:
What&#039;s the point of listing &quot;run_command_screenshot&quot; twice and not pointing which command already uses Tab? :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the screenshot:<br />
What&#8217;s the point of listing &#8220;run_command_screenshot&#8221; twice and not pointing which command already uses Tab? :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screwtape</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/28/meta_warning-and-dialogue-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Screwtape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=404#comment-807</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d want to be very (very) careful about what warnings you turn into user-visible alerts, though. The warning you&#039;ve pictured is useful, but currenty my .xsession-errors has things like &quot;Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x44000e5 (Toolbox)&quot; and &quot;Attempt to perform window operation 20 on window none when operation 20 on none already in effect&quot;, neither of which are particularly helpful to me, and would certainly be annoying if they popped up as modal dialog boxes.

Is there some way within Metacity to alter keybindings, or does that warning appear when Metacity notices a gconf update that it can&#039;t honour?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d want to be very (very) careful about what warnings you turn into user-visible alerts, though. The warning you&#8217;ve pictured is useful, but currenty my .xsession-errors has things like &#8220;Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x44000e5 (Toolbox)&#8221; and &#8220;Attempt to perform window operation 20 on window none when operation 20 on none already in effect&#8221;, neither of which are particularly helpful to me, and would certainly be annoying if they popped up as modal dialog boxes.</p>
<p>Is there some way within Metacity to alter keybindings, or does that warning appear when Metacity notices a gconf update that it can&#8217;t honour?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/02/28/meta_warning-and-dialogue-boxes/feed/ ) in 1.16694 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 6:14 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 7:14 am UTC -->
