<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bug of the day: maximise across windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/23/bug-of-the-day-maximise-across-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/23/bug-of-the-day-maximise-across-windows/</link>
	<description>"Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:58:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Grilly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/23/bug-of-the-day-maximise-across-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Grilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=534#comment-970</guid>
		<description>I work on a dual screen machine. I&#039;ve wanted this feature when viewing a side-by-side diff with a tool like Meld.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work on a dual screen machine. I&#8217;ve wanted this feature when viewing a side-by-side diff with a tool like Meld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Björn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/23/bug-of-the-day-maximise-across-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Björn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=534#comment-960</guid>
		<description>Fullscreening a window across several displays certainly would be useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fullscreening a window across several displays certainly would be useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrys</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/23/bug-of-the-day-maximise-across-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=534#comment-939</guid>
		<description>How would you handle screens with different heights or L-shaped layouts? It seems broken by design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you handle screens with different heights or L-shaped layouts? It seems broken by design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lord</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/23/bug-of-the-day-maximise-across-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=534#comment-938</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t remember when, but I&#039;ve wanted this ability before... I always thought it&#039;d be intuitive that if a window has a significant portion of itself in multiple monitors that it&#039;d maximise in those monitors too, but really, I can&#039;t think of any good justification for either of these features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember when, but I&#8217;ve wanted this ability before&#8230; I always thought it&#8217;d be intuitive that if a window has a significant portion of itself in multiple monitors that it&#8217;d maximise in those monitors too, but really, I can&#8217;t think of any good justification for either of these features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screwtape</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/23/bug-of-the-day-maximise-across-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Screwtape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=534#comment-937</guid>
		<description>You must be sick of hearing from me by now :) but I had a comment about this.

Reading the original bug closely, it seems that Windows XP doesn&#039;t in fact support this - this is a feature added by the reporter&#039;s graphics drivers, and as such wouldn&#039;t be able to change the maximization model (which IIRC is much like Metacity&#039;s).

I expect this is the sort of thing that can be accomplished with a libwnck script, assuming that libwnck exposes the Xinerama monitor layout, and usable space on each monitor (minus panels, etc.) The trickiest bit would be identifying all the possible rectangles that occupy the usable space on two or more monitors, then picking the largest such space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be sick of hearing from me by now :) but I had a comment about this.</p>
<p>Reading the original bug closely, it seems that Windows XP doesn&#8217;t in fact support this &#8211; this is a feature added by the reporter&#8217;s graphics drivers, and as such wouldn&#8217;t be able to change the maximization model (which IIRC is much like Metacity&#8217;s).</p>
<p>I expect this is the sort of thing that can be accomplished with a libwnck script, assuming that libwnck exposes the Xinerama monitor layout, and usable space on each monitor (minus panels, etc.) The trickiest bit would be identifying all the possible rectangles that occupy the usable space on two or more monitors, then picking the largest such space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
