<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squib of the day: same button, different position</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/26/squib-of-the-day-same-button-different-position/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/26/squib-of-the-day-same-button-different-position/</link>
	<description>"Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dejan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/26/squib-of-the-day-same-button-different-position/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Dejan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=545#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Strange as it sounds, I wouldn&#039;t mind this feature, for two reasons:

1) This would make it easier for me to experiment. Say, put minimize to the left, but keep it in its orthodox position as well, and see if I can get used to the new position.

2) It would minimize mouse movement: whichever direction I am moving the mouse, I can minimize/close the previously active window.

Mind you, I won&#039;t spend any time writing code for this margin of usability improvement and I certainly don&#039;t expect anyone else to do it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange as it sounds, I wouldn&#8217;t mind this feature, for two reasons:</p>
<p>1) This would make it easier for me to experiment. Say, put minimize to the left, but keep it in its orthodox position as well, and see if I can get used to the new position.</p>
<p>2) It would minimize mouse movement: whichever direction I am moving the mouse, I can minimize/close the previously active window.</p>
<p>Mind you, I won&#8217;t spend any time writing code for this margin of usability improvement and I certainly don&#8217;t expect anyone else to do it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/26/squib-of-the-day-same-button-different-position/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=545#comment-945</guid>
		<description>If someone wants to provide a patch, I don&#039;t see any reason to reject it. But it otherwise doesn&#039;t seem like a valuable use of a developer&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone wants to provide a patch, I don&#8217;t see any reason to reject it. But it otherwise doesn&#8217;t seem like a valuable use of a developer&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Peddicord</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/26/squib-of-the-day-same-button-different-position/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Peddicord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=545#comment-944</guid>
		<description>Considering changing the button layout isn&#039;t very obvious to begin with unless you live inside of gconf, I don&#039;t see why not to allow it unless it is a colossal code change. If people want to completely obliterate their titlebar usability, why stop them?
Though, I certainly hope distributors wouldn&#039;t abuse it.

It seems simpler to just say &quot;type the buttons you want on your titlebar&quot; than to say the same with an additional &quot;you can only use each button once.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering changing the button layout isn&#8217;t very obvious to begin with unless you live inside of gconf, I don&#8217;t see why not to allow it unless it is a colossal code change. If people want to completely obliterate their titlebar usability, why stop them?<br />
Though, I certainly hope distributors wouldn&#8217;t abuse it.</p>
<p>It seems simpler to just say &#8220;type the buttons you want on your titlebar&#8221; than to say the same with an additional &#8220;you can only use each button once.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/26/squib-of-the-day-same-button-different-position/feed/ ) in 1.17875 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 5:36 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 6:36 am UTC -->
