<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apologia for CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/07/20/apologia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/07/20/apologia/</link>
	<description>"Many window managers are like Marshmallow Froot Loops; Metacity is like Cheerios."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/07/20/apologia/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Arc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=633#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>That Anon speaks wisely. Also, add a dialog akin to what&#039;s available in Firefox (and most other browsers?).
&#039;&#039; Preferences &gt;&gt; Content &gt;&gt; Fonts &amp; Colors &gt;&gt; Advanced &gt;&gt; Allow pages (themes!) to choose their own fonts, instead of my selections above. &#039;&#039;

Or you could make theming modular if you want to get advanced. Instead of having one &#039;do it all theme&#039;, allow users to have a list of CSS files/packages as an &#039;advanced&#039; setting. Of course you would have to add some form of warning dialog about the possibility of problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Anon speaks wisely. Also, add a dialog akin to what&#8217;s available in Firefox (and most other browsers?).<br />
&#8221; Preferences &gt;&gt; Content &gt;&gt; Fonts &amp; Colors &gt;&gt; Advanced &gt;&gt; Allow pages (themes!) to choose their own fonts, instead of my selections above. &#8221;</p>
<p>Or you could make theming modular if you want to get advanced. Instead of having one &#8216;do it all theme&#8217;, allow users to have a list of CSS files/packages as an &#8216;advanced&#8217; setting. Of course you would have to add some form of warning dialog about the possibility of problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/07/20/apologia/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=633#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>Why not take advantage of the C in CSS: allow users to override theme settings by way of a user stylesheet which overrides the theme stylesheet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not take advantage of the C in CSS: allow users to override theme settings by way of a user stylesheet which overrides the theme stylesheet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/07/20/apologia/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=633#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>@Lubomir:

Certainly there are many good reasons not to let themes dictate the font.  Thank you for a good example of one!

I&#039;m not sure whether there&#039;s a middle ground.  Perhaps it would be safe to let them suggest a font and have the default being to override it.  Perhaps it would be safe to let them choose serif/sans-serif etc but not the actual font name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lubomir:</p>
<p>Certainly there are many good reasons not to let themes dictate the font.  Thank you for a good example of one!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether there&#8217;s a middle ground.  Perhaps it would be safe to let them suggest a font and have the default being to override it.  Perhaps it would be safe to let them choose serif/sans-serif etc but not the actual font name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lubomir</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/07/20/apologia/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Lubomir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/?p=633#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Please, be careful about allowing theme designers to set the font of the titlebar. I am pretty sure some of them will use fonts that do not contain non ascii letters and this will make some themes unusable for certain users. For example right now 3 of my 10 currently opened windows have Czech characters in title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, be careful about allowing theme designers to set the font of the titlebar. I am pretty sure some of them will use fonts that do not contain non ascii letters and this will make some themes unusable for certain users. For example right now 3 of my 10 currently opened windows have Czech characters in title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/07/20/apologia/feed/ ) in 0.22620 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:50 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 1:50 pm UTC -->
