<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: done</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/</link>
	<description>Swfdec, GStreamer, Cairo, GNOME, me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shirish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>shirish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Hi all, 
Can I use this functionality on Hardy? Any way to test the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,<br />
Can I use this functionality on Hardy? Any way to test the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menko</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>menko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Another word to swfdec, how about a whitelist for sites which will definetly work?

So Flash could actually become comfortable again.

With Gnash offering this, I think that would be good for competition.

For example Youtube.com never crashed SWFdec, did it?

http://www.heise.de/open/news/foren/S-Re-Schwarz-Weiss-Modus-und-halbe-Geschwindigkeit/forum-133595/msg-14556694/read/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another word to swfdec, how about a whitelist for sites which will definetly work?</p>
<p>So Flash could actually become comfortable again.</p>
<p>With Gnash offering this, I think that would be good for competition.</p>
<p>For example Youtube.com never crashed SWFdec, did it?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.heise.de/open/news/foren/S-Re-Schwarz-Weiss-Modus-und-halbe-Geschwindigkeit/forum-133595/msg-14556694/read/" rel="nofollow">http://www.heise.de/open/news/foren/S-Re-Schwarz-Weiss-Modus-und-halbe-Geschwindigkeit/forum-133595/msg-14556694/read/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aklapper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>aklapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Company rocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Company rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martín Soto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Martín Soto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m not a regular FTP user, but all I can say is, I take my hat off! Thanks a lot for such an impressive work done in such a tight time frame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m not a regular FTP user, but all I can say is, I take my hat off! Thanks a lot for such an impressive work done in such a tight time frame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otte</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>otte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>No, you can&#039;t CHMOD or resume downloads yet. Those were not on my list of features for 2.22.0 - it would be boring if there&#039;s nothing more to do. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you can&#8217;t CHMOD or resume downloads yet. Those were not on my list of features for 2.22.0 &#8211; it would be boring if there&#8217;s nothing more to do. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gianni</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>gianni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>does that means we can now change chmod over ftp ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does that means we can now change chmod over ftp ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuXXX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>tuXXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Looks nice! Thanks for your work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice! Thanks for your work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>engla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I trust a gvfs is (so far :) very well written if this can be accomplished correctly in so little time, with the devs even enjoying it. Great effort for all that have worked on gvfs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I trust a gvfs is (so far :) very well written if this can be accomplished correctly in so little time, with the devs even enjoying it. Great effort for all that have worked on gvfs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: troll</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Good news. Will this all make btw a subversion nautilus integration finally possible/viable? There is nothing like TortoiseSVN for Linux :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news. Will this all make btw a subversion nautilus integration finally possible/viable? There is nothing like TortoiseSVN for Linux :-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also looking forward to the next Linux desktop releases with gvfs. I&#039;ve heard that transfer speed over sftp is greatly improved, have you been able to witness this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also looking forward to the next Linux desktop releases with gvfs. I&#8217;ve heard that transfer speed over sftp is greatly improved, have you been able to witness this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/03/06/done-2/feed/ ) in 1.17517 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:03 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 7:03 am UTC -->
