<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: on marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ethana2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>Well now they all have specs.  Finally.
...so we&#039;ll see which one handles said specs better over the next year or two...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well now they all have specs.  Finally.<br />
&#8230;so we&#8217;ll see which one handles said specs better over the next year or two&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menko</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>menko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Hey, people (read non pgo-readers) are just getting started to become aware of swfdec: http://www.google.com/trends?q=swfdec%2C+gnash&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=ytd&amp;sort=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, people (read non pgo-readers) are just getting started to become aware of swfdec: <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=swfdec%2C+gnash&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=ytd&amp;sort=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/trends?q=swfdec%2C+gnash&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=ytd&amp;sort=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAGuy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>I pretty much agree with nona on the impression of Swfdec vs. Gnash.
Unfortunately, I also think that Swfdec can state more forcibly what it supports.

However, you&#039;ve dealt with plenty of complicated, dumb and sometimes crazy Flash files. Can&#039;t you make a website with all of them as a test suite?
If the files aren&#039;t yours to share, can you make a list of links (specific links, not &quot;Google Games now works&quot;) of files that Swfdec manages to work on?

This should be a concrete statement. Maybe the Gnash guys will also do something like this. In the best case, it might spurn both projects to work harder on parsing the files they currently don&#039;t.

In summary, keep up the good work, and don&#039;t be discouraged by marketing.

Thank you for writing Swfdec</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much agree with nona on the impression of Swfdec vs. Gnash.<br />
Unfortunately, I also think that Swfdec can state more forcibly what it supports.</p>
<p>However, you&#8217;ve dealt with plenty of complicated, dumb and sometimes crazy Flash files. Can&#8217;t you make a website with all of them as a test suite?<br />
If the files aren&#8217;t yours to share, can you make a list of links (specific links, not &#8220;Google Games now works&#8221;) of files that Swfdec manages to work on?</p>
<p>This should be a concrete statement. Maybe the Gnash guys will also do something like this. In the best case, it might spurn both projects to work harder on parsing the files they currently don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>In summary, keep up the good work, and don&#8217;t be discouraged by marketing.</p>
<p>Thank you for writing Swfdec</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nona</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>nona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/#comment-651</guid>
		<description>While I generally have a very good impression of swfdec (wrt to Gnash for instance), this impression is mostly based on completely subjective criteria. It is quite hard to figure out what it&#039;s aiming to support - there&#039;s no real &quot;status&quot; page. Gnash claiming full Flash 7 support at least let&#039;s me know what they&#039;re aiming, or are close to support.

I guess it&#039;s not easy to have a status page with all the different thing AS2/3 support. But some way of gauging progress would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I generally have a very good impression of swfdec (wrt to Gnash for instance), this impression is mostly based on completely subjective criteria. It is quite hard to figure out what it&#8217;s aiming to support &#8211; there&#8217;s no real &#8220;status&#8221; page. Gnash claiming full Flash 7 support at least let&#8217;s me know what they&#8217;re aiming, or are close to support.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s not easy to have a status page with all the different thing AS2/3 support. But some way of gauging progress would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Cumming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Cumming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/#comment-650</guid>
		<description>Also, with Gnash you seem to be talking about &quot;selling&quot;. And over-selling (false or unrealistic claims) is itself fatal for any marketing effort because people learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, with Gnash you seem to be talking about &#8220;selling&#8221;. And over-selling (false or unrealistic claims) is itself fatal for any marketing effort because people learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Cumming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray Cumming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/04/29/on-marketing/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>But in the same sentence, wikipedia says &quot;discerns consumers&#039; wants&quot;. People like to have what they want. That seems reciprocal to me. Not that it&#039;s ever that simple or benign, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But in the same sentence, wikipedia says &#8220;discerns consumers&#8217; wants&#8221;. People like to have what they want. That seems reciprocal to me. Not that it&#8217;s ever that simple or benign, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
