http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/05/01/required-reading/ Swfdec, GStreamer, Cairo, GNOME, me Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:43:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/05/01/required-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-661 Christopher Thu, 01 May 2008 23:30:46 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/05/01/required-reading/#comment-661 They've released the FLV specs, but are they releasing the RTMP protocol information at all? They’ve released the FLV specs, but are they releasing the RTMP protocol information at all?

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/05/01/required-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-660 Joe Buck Thu, 01 May 2008 16:14:48 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/05/01/required-reading/#comment-660 You write "I don't expect this will affect Swfdec very much", and the link says you say that because you already have the information. But I think you're underestimating the effect. Programmers who work in litigious countries (like the US) will feel much more confident now that they can help swfdec without legal risk, and there's a real spec, instead of reverse-engineered one, to test against. You write “I don’t expect this will affect Swfdec very much”, and the link says you say that because you already have the information. But I think you’re underestimating the effect. Programmers who work in litigious countries (like the US) will feel much more confident now that they can help swfdec without legal risk, and there’s a real spec, instead of reverse-engineered one, to test against.

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/05/01/required-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-658 Rahul Sundaram Thu, 01 May 2008 13:59:57 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/05/01/required-reading/#comment-658 Does this include a patent grant or license? Does this include a patent grant or license?

]]>