<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dropping old Bug-Buddy reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frej Soya</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Frej Soya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Sometimes valid reports are dropped. A dialog with pure XML pops up ;). (Error)&lt;p/&gt;I havent investigated but:&lt;br/&gt;Either size of post (with a full stack trace) or entity &lt;br/&gt;encoding seems to be the problem.&lt;p/&gt;Sorry for the lousy bugreport :(.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes valid reports are dropped. A dialog with pure XML pops up <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . (Error)
<p />I havent investigated but:<br />Either size of post (with a full stack trace) or entity <br />encoding seems to be the problem.
<p />Sorry for the lousy bugreport <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-sad.png' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Some users might be very annoyed at spending considerable amounts of their time filling out bug report only to have it rejected.  Is there anything which can be done to mitigate against this?  If nothing else perhaps the warnings messages in future versions of bug-buddy need to be more strongly but carefully warn users of the need to upgrade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some users might be very annoyed at spending considerable amounts of their time filling out bug report only to have it rejected.  Is there anything which can be done to mitigate against this?  If nothing else perhaps the warnings messages in future versions of bug-buddy need to be more strongly but carefully warn users of the need to upgrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>bkor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Alan: Did you miss my update about 2.14 and older bug-buddy versions? Those bugreports are mostly lost anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan: Did you miss my update about 2.14 and older bug-buddy versions? Those bugreports are mostly lost anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure I get what you are saying and dropping the old mostly useless reports sounds entirely reasonable.  What I am saying is that there will always be a few users who think filing a bug report is a lot of hassle but will do it anyway, unfortunately only later realising the report is not of any use so if you can future proof bug-buddy the client itself and give better warnings at that point rather than just quietly dropping the information at the bugzilla stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure I get what you are saying and dropping the old mostly useless reports sounds entirely reasonable.  What I am saying is that there will always be a few users who think filing a bug report is a lot of hassle but will do it anyway, unfortunately only later realising the report is not of any use so if you can future proof bug-buddy the client itself and give better warnings at that point rather than just quietly dropping the information at the bugzilla stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2007/04/08/dropping-old-bug-buddy-reports/feed/ ) in 0.16899 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 4:17 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:17 am UTC -->
