<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Git git git</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Sharpe: DVCS Interoperability &#124; c3i</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>James Sharpe: DVCS Interoperability &#124; c3i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>[...] quite clear from the various discussions related to DVCS that there isn’t going to be one clear winner for the choice of VCS for Gnome; everyone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quite clear from the various discussions related to DVCS that there isn’t going to be one clear winner for the choice of VCS for Gnome; everyone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James&#8217; SOC Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DVCS Interoperability</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>James&#8217; SOC Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DVCS Interoperability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>[...] quite clear from the various discussions related to DVCS that there isn&#8217;t going to be one clear winner for the choice of VCS for Gnome; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quite clear from the various discussions related to DVCS that there isn&#8217;t going to be one clear winner for the choice of VCS for Gnome; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ovitters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>ovitters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>S.F.: I think Bzr has several drawbacks. However, these are acknowledged by the devs, and there is a roadmap to fix those. So I don&#039;t consider e.g. Bzr ready ATM. But that doesn&#039;t matter, as I know it is being worked upon, and preparations take months anyway (e.g. just a distro upgrade of svn.gnome.org took a lot more preparation that you might see from the outside.. dealing with contingency, etc .. further some sysadmin stuff like switching LDAP replication methods won&#039;t be noticed at all).

And actually, I do like the Bzr and Git mirrors for the reason that everyone could use their own tool. However, the backend (SVN) isn&#039;t great as it doesn&#039;t track enough information. Further, the git-svn is not at all like plain Git. While Bzr works fine (as far as I&#039;ve experienced).

It is really unfortunate that you cannot just use your own tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.F.: I think Bzr has several drawbacks. However, these are acknowledged by the devs, and there is a roadmap to fix those. So I don&#8217;t consider e.g. Bzr ready ATM. But that doesn&#8217;t matter, as I know it is being worked upon, and preparations take months anyway (e.g. just a distro upgrade of svn.gnome.org took a lot more preparation that you might see from the outside.. dealing with contingency, etc .. further some sysadmin stuff like switching LDAP replication methods won&#8217;t be noticed at all).</p>
<p>And actually, I do like the Bzr and Git mirrors for the reason that everyone could use their own tool. However, the backend (SVN) isn&#8217;t great as it doesn&#8217;t track enough information. Further, the git-svn is not at all like plain Git. While Bzr works fine (as far as I&#8217;ve experienced).</p>
<p>It is really unfortunate that you cannot just use your own tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.F.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>S.F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Bzr people are vocal too.

As Company (otte) said, I&#039;m fine with SVN as long as I can use git for my daily work. git-svn is a great tool, and I think that despite SVN makes everyone rant a little, switching to a VCS tool will make half of the gnome crowd rant more: there is no git-bzr tool, and I don&#039;t know whether there is a bzr-git one (and if there is one, we should switch to git since it wouldn&#039;t harm the bzr people ;-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bzr people are vocal too.</p>
<p>As Company (otte) said, I&#8217;m fine with SVN as long as I can use git for my daily work. git-svn is a great tool, and I think that despite SVN makes everyone rant a little, switching to a VCS tool will make half of the gnome crowd rant more: there is no git-bzr tool, and I don&#8217;t know whether there is a bzr-git one (and if there is one, we should switch to git since it wouldn&#8217;t harm the bzr people <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharms</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>sharms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe you are alone in this view, the GIT people are just very vocal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe you are alone in this view, the GIT people are just very vocal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otte</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>otte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care if we have bzr, hg, tla, cvs or whatever else on gnome.org as long as I can use git.

I&#039;ve only been under the impression, that you admins only wanted to support one SVCD, in which case, it obviously has to be git.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care if we have bzr, hg, tla, cvs or whatever else on gnome.org as long as I can use git.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only been under the impression, that you admins only wanted to support one SVCD, in which case, it obviously has to be git.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdasd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>asdasd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/#comment-365</guid>
		<description>That was one of the weirdest postings I have seen in a long time. Keep up the work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was one of the weirdest postings I have seen in a long time. Keep up the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2008/06/26/git-git-git/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Great rant. Very lucid. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great rant. Very lucid. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
