Comments on: GtkSourceView Licensing: a social networking experiment http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/06/19/gtksourceview-licensing-a-social-networking-experiment/ pbor's little blue box Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:09:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Alan http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/06/19/gtksourceview-licensing-a-social-networking-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Alan Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:46:07 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/06/19/gtksourceview-licensing-a-social-networking-experiment/#comment-2 Think I submitted a lang file for Scheme or Lisp or something but it may not have been the one used in the end. LGPL away. Think I submitted a lang file for Scheme or Lisp or something but it may not have been the one used in the end. LGPL away.

]]> By: Onkar http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/06/19/gtksourceview-licensing-a-social-networking-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1 Onkar Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:39:46 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/06/19/gtksourceview-licensing-a-social-networking-experiment/#comment-1 I had submitted a .lang file for syntax highlighting. I don't know if it ever got accepted. I have no objection for using it under LGPL if you want. The tracker bug is http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412587 Also let me know if you want the file in new format. gnusim8085 uses gtksourceview1 as editing component. If the .lang file becomes part of gtksourceview it will be helpful. I had submitted a .lang file for syntax highlighting. I don’t know if it ever got accepted. I have no objection for using it under LGPL if you want. The tracker bug is http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412587

Also let me know if you want the file in new format. gnusim8085 uses gtksourceview1 as editing component. If the .lang file becomes part of gtksourceview it will be helpful.

]]>