<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delivering the killing blow to libgnome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/</link>
	<description>pbor's little blue box</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pbor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>pbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>@Don: yes, d-bus sounds like a good solution... especially if pressing the help button in different dialogs makes yelp switch page instead of spawning new instances

@ken: I do not agree, session saving is useful IMHO... the problem you see are due to bad implementation, which is in turn due to 1) sloppy application programmers and 2) bad and undocumented session saving API

@Dennis: gedit uses it&#039;s own gedit-history-entry implementation  (since gnome_entry_new didn&#039;t use GtkComboBox), feel free to steal it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Don: yes, d-bus sounds like a good solution&#8230; especially if pressing the help button in different dialogs makes yelp switch page instead of spawning new instances</p>
<p>@ken: I do not agree, session saving is useful IMHO&#8230; the problem you see are due to bad implementation, which is in turn due to 1) sloppy application programmers and 2) bad and undocumented session saving API</p>
<p>@Dennis: gedit uses it&#8217;s own gedit-history-entry implementation  (since gnome_entry_new didn&#8217;t use GtkComboBox), feel free to steal it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuele Bassi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuele Bassi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>@Marko: either gtk+ or gio/gvfs. the problematic bit is the fact that the thumbnailers (the actual programs creating the thumbnails) are stored inside gconf; hence, we need a migration path for that as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marko: either gtk+ or gio/gvfs. the problematic bit is the fact that the thumbnailers (the actual programs creating the thumbnails) are stored inside gconf; hence, we need a migration path for that as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>You missed gnome_entry_new().  Gtk+ does not offer a widget with auto-saved history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed gnome_entry_new().  Gtk+ does not offer a widget with auto-saved history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve written a few (unofficial) GNOME apps, and I still don&#039;t know what &quot;sessions&quot; are, or what they&#039;re good for.

All I know is that they&#039;re an extra boolean question you get asked whenever you log out from GNOME, and if you answer wrong you get 5 xchats next time you log in.

So I agree that &quot;sessions&quot; shouldn&#039;t be in GNOME ... they probably shouldn&#039;t exist at all.  Die, sessions, die!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written a few (unofficial) GNOME apps, and I still don&#8217;t know what &#8220;sessions&#8221; are, or what they&#8217;re good for.</p>
<p>All I know is that they&#8217;re an extra boolean question you get asked whenever you log out from GNOME, and if you answer wrong you get 5 xchats next time you log in.</p>
<p>So I agree that &#8220;sessions&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t be in GNOME &#8230; they probably shouldn&#8217;t exist at all.  Die, sessions, die!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Scorgie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Scorgie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Regarding the help stuff:
We are working on a replacement as I speak.  The idea will be to have either a dbus signal:
org.freedesktop.open_help() 
and org.gnome.open_help_page ()
or similar

as well as command-line access, for those who don&#039;t like dbus:
yelp ghelp:gedit
(which you can do at the moment, but is slightly messy for various reasons)

I&#039;ve also considered a small library to link against, but it seems like overkill since there will only be 1-2 functions in it.

Hopefully, we&#039;ll have a solution in place early this release cycle so everyone can start the migration.

Hope this helps
You&#039;re friendly yelp hacker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the help stuff:<br />
We are working on a replacement as I speak.  The idea will be to have either a dbus signal:<br />
org.freedesktop.open_help()<br />
and org.gnome.open_help_page ()<br />
or similar</p>
<p>as well as command-line access, for those who don&#8217;t like dbus:<br />
yelp ghelp:gedit<br />
(which you can do at the moment, but is slightly messy for various reasons)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also considered a small library to link against, but it seems like overkill since there will only be 1-2 functions in it.</p>
<p>Hopefully, we&#8217;ll have a solution in place early this release cycle so everyone can start the migration.</p>
<p>Hope this helps<br />
You&#8217;re friendly yelp hacker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko Anastasov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Anastasov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>There is also gnome_thumbnail_factory_*. Which module would that belong to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also gnome_thumbnail_factory_*. Which module would that belong to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>pbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>@Mikael: there is a patch in bugzilla (though it needs some updating). We decided it was a bit too late for 2.20 but it will definately go in 2.22, especially if tools to edit GtkBuilder files show up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mikael: there is a patch in bugzilla (though it needs some updating). We decided it was a bit too late for 2.20 but it will definately go in 2.22, especially if tools to edit GtkBuilder files show up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael Hermansson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael Hermansson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>how the status replace libglade with gtkbuilder API in gedit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how the status replace libglade with gtkbuilder API in gedit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>pbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>@jhs: well, the average gnome app has no dockable toolbars...  I am sure there are other things still missing, but I was just concerned with the ones that affect 90% of our applications

@olav: awesome! Maybe it was just me not paying enough attention...

@Jani: yes, I know many apps replaced gnome_help_display(), and I still think that cut&amp;paste is a suboptimal solution

@Dan: great! I didn&#039;t know about that patch... If the code is there I think that session saving should stay: if someone doesn&#039;t want to save he can just ignore the signal.

@Oded: works for me here on ubuntu 7.10 and it works for everyone I asked... if it really doesn&#039;t work for you then file a bug

@alex: sounds good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-33">jhs</a>: well, the average gnome app has no dockable toolbars&#8230;  I am sure there are other things still missing, but I was just concerned with the ones that affect 90% of our applications</p>
<p>@olav: awesome! Maybe it was just me not paying enough attention&#8230;</p>
<p>@Jani: yes, I know many apps replaced gnome_help_display(), and I still think that cut&amp;paste is a suboptimal solution</p>
<p>@Dan: great! I didn&#8217;t know about that patch&#8230; If the code is there I think that session saving should stay: if someone doesn&#8217;t want to save he can just ignore the signal.</p>
<p>@Oded: works for me here on ubuntu 7.10 and it works for everyone I asked&#8230; if it really doesn&#8217;t work for you then file a bug</p>
<p>@alex: sounds good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>alexl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/pbor/2007/09/24/delivering-the-killing-blow-to-libgnome/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t figured out the gnome_icon_lookup story fully, but its gio will to a large degree replace it. You can get the &quot;icon&quot; attribute for files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t figured out the gnome_icon_lookup story fully, but its gio will to a large degree replace it. You can get the &#8220;icon&#8221; attribute for files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
