<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Print shops and posters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/raphael/2006/01/16/print-shops-and-posters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/raphael/2006/01/16/print-shops-and-posters/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/raphael/2006/01/16/print-shops-and-posters/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/raphael/2006/01/16/print-shops-and-posters/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Ahem, why didn't you simply resample existing image to 300dpi?&lt;p/&gt;Magazines do it all the time with software screenshots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem, why didn&#8217;t you simply resample existing image to 300dpi?
<p />Magazines do it all the time with software screenshots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphaël Quinet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/raphael/2006/01/16/print-shops-and-posters/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphaël Quinet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/raphael/2006/01/16/print-shops-and-posters/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Well, as I wrote above I did resample the existing image to 300dpi (using GIMP).  But just for the sake of using some of the additional pixels, I re-rendered a few parts of the image at 300dpi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as I wrote above I did resample the existing image to 300dpi (using GIMP).  But just for the sake of using some of the additional pixels, I re-rendered a few parts of the image at 300dpi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphaël Quinet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/raphael/2006/01/16/print-shops-and-posters/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphaël Quinet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/raphael/2006/01/16/print-shops-and-posters/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Just to be a bit more specific in case my previous comment was not clear enough: I used GIMP to resample the existing image to 300dpi.  Then I used POV-Ray to re-render a few interesting areas.  For example, my wife wanted the ugly blue street sign to be as readable as possible.  So I ran povray with the following options: +W11811 +H8268 (new dimensions of the full image) +SC8205 +SR335 +EC8770 +ER1150 (region of interest from 8205,335 to 8770,1150).  This provided a higher resolution for that small area, while the other parts of the image were simply scaled up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be a bit more specific in case my previous comment was not clear enough: I used GIMP to resample the existing image to 300dpi.  Then I used POV-Ray to re-render a few interesting areas.  For example, my wife wanted the ugly blue street sign to be as readable as possible.  So I ran povray with the following options: +W11811 +H8268 (new dimensions of the full image) +SC8205 +SR335 +EC8770 +ER1150 (region of interest from 8205,335 to 8770,1150).  This provided a higher resolution for that small area, while the other parts of the image were simply scaled up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
