http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/ Random thoughts Wed, 04 May 2011 03:13:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-221 James Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:33:24 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/#comment-221 What about the hall of shame for ffmpeg's inability to make actual releases instead of telling people to just use SVN? What about the hall of shame for ffmpeg’s inability to make actual releases instead of telling people to just use SVN?

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-220 rbultje Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:17:41 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/#comment-220 Hall of Fame: http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/projects.html Hall of Fame: http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/projects.html

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-219 me Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:33:41 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/#comment-219 a pitty that you only have a hall of shame, giving them publicity. What about a hall of fame? a pitty that you only have a hall of shame, giving them publicity. What about a hall of fame?

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-218 jauco Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:11:17 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/#comment-218 it might be smart to either remove the links to the offenders, or at least add rel="noref" to them. it might be smart to either remove the links to the offenders, or at least add rel=”noref” to them.

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-217 Dominic Lachowicz Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:36:26 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rbultje/2008/03/31/ffmpeg-hall-of-shame/#comment-217 While failure to give credit where credit is due is regrettable, it's not a "violation" of FFmpeg's LGPL license. These products may violate the LGPL in other ways, but I wouldn't get too hung up over the "credit" part. While failure to give credit where credit is due is regrettable, it’s not a “violation” of FFmpeg’s LGPL license. These products may violate the LGPL in other ways, but I wouldn’t get too hung up over the “credit” part.

]]>