Comments on: Talking with Microsoft http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/05/02/talking-with-microsoft/ From lost to the river Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:27:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Marcos http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/05/02/talking-with-microsoft/#comment-282 Marcos Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/05/02/talking-with-microsoft/#comment-282 You felt into their trap and what's worse went there unprepared to fight the viciousness of their attacks as good humored as they appeared to be.<p/>What did you expect? A fair and balanced view of Linux from Microsoft? Why even engage these assholes when you know that all they will do is spread lies, innuendo and uncertainty about Linux.<p/>Don't visit their offices. Just tell them to fuck off and continue improving free software.<p/>Fuck them. You felt into their trap and what’s worse went there unprepared to fight the viciousness of their attacks as good humored as they appeared to be.

What did you expect? A fair and balanced view of Linux from Microsoft? Why even engage these assholes when you know that all they will do is spread lies, innuendo and uncertainty about Linux.

Don’t visit their offices. Just tell them to fuck off and continue improving free software.

Fuck them.

]]> By: Mike Hearn http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/05/02/talking-with-microsoft/#comment-283 Mike Hearn Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/05/02/talking-with-microsoft/#comment-283 Coverity are allowing the free software community to use their static analysis tools which are just as good as the MS specific ones developed by MSR Coverity are allowing the free software community to use their static analysis tools which are just as good as the MS specific ones developed by MSR

]]> By: Chema Alonso http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/05/02/talking-with-microsoft/#comment-284 Chema Alonso Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/05/02/talking-with-microsoft/#comment-284 Hi all, <p/>well, in fact, my opinion isn't exactly that FS is more insecure that PS. My opinion is that Microsoft has improved his Security Team and also that SDL is running ok. I think that Open Source is more easy to hack (Mitmik said it too and a lot of studies of security researches), and things on that way. <p/>I don't like wars, i love talking about tech. I don`t want to say lies Marcos. It just my opinion. <p/>Best regards for all!<p/>PS: SFME<br/> Hi all,

well, in fact, my opinion isn’t exactly that FS is more insecure that PS. My opinion is that Microsoft has improved his Security Team and also that SDL is running ok. I think that Open Source is more easy to hack (Mitmik said it too and a lot of studies of security researches), and things on that way.

I don’t like wars, i love talking about tech. I don`t want to say lies Marcos. It just my opinion.

Best regards for all!

PS: SFME

]]>