<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porting GNOME to D-BUS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/</link>
	<description>From lost to the river</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:45:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oGALAXYo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>oGALAXYo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I think GNOME 3 would be the correct time to switch this. Means that you can keep a working desktop during that time.&lt;p/&gt;Do the same was KDE did, work porting to GNOME 3 and switch everything correctly and keep the stable GNOME 2 series during that time so people can continue using something that more or less works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think GNOME 3 would be the correct time to switch this. Means that you can keep a working desktop during that time.
<p />Do the same was KDE did, work porting to GNOME 3 and switch everything correctly and keep the stable GNOME 2 series during that time so people can continue using something that more or less works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Moya</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Moya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we need to wait for GNOME 3, most uses of Bonobo/CORBA in GNOME are internal things, not really being used by 3rd party apps, so it&#039;s not a huge amount of work, as you can see from the patches.&lt;p/&gt;The only big Bonobo user is Evolution and the panel. For Evolution, there is a patch to make it work with DBUS, and all CORBA use is internal to the app and the wrapper libraries. For the panel, it is also internal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we need to wait for GNOME 3, most uses of Bonobo/CORBA in GNOME are internal things, not really being used by 3rd party apps, so it&#8217;s not a huge amount of work, as you can see from the patches.
<p />The only big Bonobo user is Evolution and the panel. For Evolution, there is a patch to make it work with DBUS, and all CORBA use is internal to the app and the wrapper libraries. For the panel, it is also internal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Puydt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Puydt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Notice that ekiga already has some DBUS support (disabled by default, though) since 2.0...&lt;p/&gt;And I plan to make it even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that ekiga already has some DBUS support (disabled by default, though) since 2.0&#8230;
<p />And I plan to make it even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>From GPE(.HandHelds.org)&#039;s world:&lt;p/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GnomeVFS_D-BUS&quot;&gt;http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GnomeVFS_D-BUS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GConf_D-BUS&quot;&gt;http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GConf_D-BUS&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From GPE(.HandHelds.org)&#8217;s world:
<p /><a href="http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GnomeVFS_D-BUS">http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GnomeVFS_D-BUS</a><br /><a href="http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GConf_D-BUS">http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GConf_D-BUS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oGALAXYo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>oGALAXYo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2006/06/05/porting-gnome-to-d-bus/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>I see, most of the stuff already has D-BUS patches (though somehow spread everywhere) but in this case it makes sense collecting them and applying them ASAP so the substitution process can start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see, most of the stuff already has D-BUS patches (though somehow spread everywhere) but in this case it makes sense collecting them and applying them ASAP so the substitution process can start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
