Comments on: Control Center patch party http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/ From lost to the river Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:48:55 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: dieguito http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/comment-page-1/#comment-400 dieguito Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/#comment-400 Tomándote la palabra:<p/><a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317097">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317097</a> Tomándote la palabra:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317097

]]> By: Luca http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/comment-page-1/#comment-401 Luca Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/#comment-401 Hi Rodrigo, may I suggest also bug 356435? Hi Rodrigo, may I suggest also bug 356435?

]]> By: andre klapper http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/comment-page-1/#comment-402 andre klapper Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/#comment-402 hejhej.<br/>sorted by importance:<p/>#1 <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356435#c46">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356435#c46</a> - more than 100 crasher dups, two-liner patch.<p/>#2 <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c36">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c36</a> , <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c53">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c53</a> and <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c66">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c66</a> - 65 dups.<p/>#3 <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336286#c8">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336286#c8</a> looks like it would only need some small rework, but i guess that lucas (who wrote that patch) is busy himself so he won't come up with an updated patch within the next days...<p/>#4 <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133815#c53">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133815#c53</a> , but rodrigo is already dealing with that (thanks). hejhej.
sorted by importance:

#1 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356435#c46 – more than 100 crasher dups, two-liner patch.

#2 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c36 , http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c53 and http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363005#c66 – 65 dups.

#3 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336286#c8 looks like it would only need some small rework, but i guess that lucas (who wrote that patch) is busy himself so he won’t come up with an updated patch within the next days…

#4 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133815#c53 , but rodrigo is already dealing with that (thanks).

]]> By: andre klapper http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/comment-page-1/#comment-403 andre klapper Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2007/01/05/control-center-patch-party/#comment-403 <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=343584">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=343584</a>,317507,392276,349471,382039,353828,359039,352781,383029,383022,382730,339551,333557,375567,341899,348435,376079<br/>would also be a nice list to review http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=343584,317507,392276,349471,382039,353828,359039,352781,383029,383022,382730,339551,333557,375567,341899,348435,376079
would also be a nice list to review

]]>