<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desktop effects activation</title>
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/</link>
	<description>From lost to the river</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bub</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>bub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>Adam: I am just a lowly user (and developer), but I think I can understand why other distros do their own thing. Just look at yast in current opensuse - it's like a boeing 747 control panel, there are far too many similarly named widgets and many panels force you to go through a 7 step wizard, when you only need to change a single setting like IP address. I haven't used Mandriva for quite some time, but it seems to be much simpler. However, I'm sorry to say that but it looks very amateurish in some places, for example when I installed ipw2200 firmware an ugly grey dialog with monospaced text popped up, which cannot be cancelled and gave no progress indication. This kind of dialogs were present in some other parts of configuration as well. I think Ubuntu fares much better in these areas, they seem to consistently use proper spacing, fonts, give progress indicators for tasks which take more time. If they only fixed the ridiculous preferences menu and made a control panel out of it. Fedora also seems quite nice in this regard, but I haven't used it much lately because Ubuntu seems to be easier to use overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam: I am just a lowly user (and developer), but I think I can understand why other distros do their own thing. Just look at yast in current opensuse - it&#8217;s like a boeing 747 control panel, there are far too many similarly named widgets and many panels force you to go through a 7 step wizard, when you only need to change a single setting like IP address. I haven&#8217;t used Mandriva for quite some time, but it seems to be much simpler. However, I&#8217;m sorry to say that but it looks very amateurish in some places, for example when I installed ipw2200 firmware an ugly grey dialog with monospaced text popped up, which cannot be cancelled and gave no progress indication. This kind of dialogs were present in some other parts of configuration as well. I think Ubuntu fares much better in these areas, they seem to consistently use proper spacing, fonts, give progress indicators for tasks which take more time. If they only fixed the ridiculous preferences menu and made a control panel out of it. Fedora also seems quite nice in this regard, but I haven&#8217;t used it much lately because Ubuntu seems to be easier to use overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pirast</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>pirast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-621</guid>
		<description>well, its all about merging it to the gnome settings tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, its all about merging it to the gnome settings tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Thurman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Thurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>You're proposing that GNOME should have a capplet which allows switching between Metacity and $random_other_WM, or Metacity and Compiz?  If the latter, are you proposing that Compiz should become an officially-supported GNOME project?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re proposing that GNOME should have a capplet which allows switching between Metacity and $random_other_WM, or Metacity and Compiz?  If the latter, are you proposing that Compiz should become an officially-supported GNOME project?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Williamson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>And, cough, Mandriva. Who had it before anyone else. In a cross-desktop utility (drak3d). Which was available under GPL. Not, of course, that anyone else bothered to use it. *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, cough, Mandriva. Who had it before anyone else. In a cross-desktop utility (drak3d). Which was available under GPL. Not, of course, that anyone else bothered to use it. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristian Høgsberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristian Høgsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/03/28/desktop-effects-activation/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Yay!  Let's do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!  Let&#8217;s do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
