<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdminKit 0.0.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/</link>
	<description>From lost to the river</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:57:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Tarricone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Tarricone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-756</guid>
		<description>&quot;... which is, in the good old Richard Hughes tradition, a thing called AdminKit...&quot;

Rather, in good old Apple/NeXT tradition...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; which is, in the good old Richard Hughes tradition, a thing called AdminKit&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Rather, in good old Apple/NeXT tradition&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-755</guid>
		<description>Oh cool, but why not get that functionality merged back into policykit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh cool, but why not get that functionality merged back into policykit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Moya</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Moya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Jeff, OlicyKit just offers the framework for running stuff as root, but it doesn&#039;t contain the actual implementation of those specific tasks (RunAsRoot, AddUser, etc), so AdminKit, based on PolicyKit, offers that.

Michael: no, will not be in 11.1, but in 11.2 probably</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, OlicyKit just offers the framework for running stuff as root, but it doesn&#8217;t contain the actual implementation of those specific tasks (RunAsRoot, AddUser, etc), so AdminKit, based on PolicyKit, offers that.</p>
<p>Michael: no, will not be in 11.1, but in 11.2 probably</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-753</guid>
		<description>No offense, but what is the point? Can you write a followup blog on why AdminKit exists and the specific niche it is attempting to fill?

What can AdminKit that PolicyKit can&#039;t do already? It seems like you should patch PolicyKit instead of a subset of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense, but what is the point? Can you write a followup blog on why AdminKit exists and the specific niche it is attempting to fill?</p>
<p>What can AdminKit that PolicyKit can&#8217;t do already? It seems like you should patch PolicyKit instead of a subset of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Nice! will this make it into openSUSE 11.1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! will this make it into openSUSE 11.1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-751</guid>
		<description>I hope you don&#039;t plan to use Perl as in system-tools-backends! It would be good to get rid of system-tools-backends and the Perl dependency once and for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you don&#8217;t plan to use Perl as in system-tools-backends! It would be good to get rid of system-tools-backends and the Perl dependency once and for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-750</guid>
		<description>What we really need is to be able to connect to a server and administer it, much like the printer tools in GNOME these days.  Well at least the ones in Ubuntu and I image Fedore and SUSE.

This would seriously kick....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we really need is to be able to connect to a server and administer it, much like the printer tools in GNOME these days.  Well at least the ones in Ubuntu and I image Fedore and SUSE.</p>
<p>This would seriously kick&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo Noronha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Noronha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Hello! Nice work you got there! I wanted to let you know that I am writing a PolicyKit-based version of gksu; take a look here:

  http://live.gnome.org/gksu
  git://kov.eti.br/srv/git/gksu-polkit.git/

It&#039;s almost feature complete, provides X authentication &quot;forwarding&quot; like the earlier gksu, and also provides a way to let the developers and administrators specify what environment variables should be &quot;forwarded&quot; too.

My code contains a library to provide an easy interface for applications. The library even handles the client-side PolicyKit work, and I/O (stdin/stdout/stderr). Take a look, perhaps we can merge some of your work for RunAsRoot into gksu-polkit and keep going from there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Nice work you got there! I wanted to let you know that I am writing a PolicyKit-based version of gksu; take a look here:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://live.gnome.org/gksu" rel="nofollow">http://live.gnome.org/gksu</a><br />
  git://kov.eti.br/srv/git/gksu-polkit.git/</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost feature complete, provides X authentication &#8220;forwarding&#8221; like the earlier gksu, and also provides a way to let the developers and administrators specify what environment variables should be &#8220;forwarded&#8221; too.</p>
<p>My code contains a library to provide an easy interface for applications. The library even handles the client-side PolicyKit work, and I/O (stdin/stdout/stderr). Take a look, perhaps we can merge some of your work for RunAsRoot into gksu-polkit and keep going from there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethana2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/2008/10/22/adminkit-001/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>ethana2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/rodrigo/?p=378#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Is this going to do stuff like the following?

ethan@home:~$ tail -27 .bashrc
# system command aliases
alias list=&#039;ls&#039;
alias delete=&#039;rm&#039;
alias DELETE=&#039;sudo rm&#039;
alias frigging=&#039;sudo&#039;
alias install=&#039;sudo apt-get install&#039;
alias uninstall=&#039;sudo apt-get remove&#039;
alias check-update=&#039;sudo apt-get update&#039;
alias update=&#039;sudo apt-get upgrade&#039;
alias murder=&#039;sudo killall&#039;
alias get=&#039;wget&#039;
alias GET=&#039;sudo wget&#039;
alias enter=&#039;cd&#039;
alias up=&#039;cd ..&#039;
alias home=&#039;cd ~/&#039;
alias unmount=&#039;umount&#039;

#functions
function remove () { mv &quot;$@&quot; ~/.local/share/Trash/files; }
function REMOVE () { sudo mv &quot;$@&quot; ~/.local/share/Trash/files; }

# enable programmable completion features (you don&#039;t need to enable
# this, if it&#039;s already enabled in /etc/bash.bashrc and /etc/profile
# sources /etc/bash.bashrc).
if [ -f /etc/bash_completion ]; then
    . /etc/bash_completion
fi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this going to do stuff like the following?</p>
<p>ethan@home:~$ tail -27 .bashrc<br />
# system command aliases<br />
alias list=&#8217;ls&#8217;<br />
alias delete=&#8217;rm&#8217;<br />
alias DELETE=&#8217;sudo rm&#8217;<br />
alias frigging=&#8217;sudo&#8217;<br />
alias install=&#8217;sudo apt-get install&#8217;<br />
alias uninstall=&#8217;sudo apt-get remove&#8217;<br />
alias check-update=&#8217;sudo apt-get update&#8217;<br />
alias update=&#8217;sudo apt-get upgrade&#8217;<br />
alias murder=&#8217;sudo killall&#8217;<br />
alias get=&#8217;wget&#8217;<br />
alias GET=&#8217;sudo wget&#8217;<br />
alias enter=&#8217;cd&#8217;<br />
alias up=&#8217;cd ..&#8217;<br />
alias home=&#8217;cd ~/&#8217;<br />
alias unmount=&#8217;umount&#8217;</p>
<p>#functions<br />
function remove () { mv &#8220;$@&#8221; ~/.local/share/Trash/files; }<br />
function REMOVE () { sudo mv &#8220;$@&#8221; ~/.local/share/Trash/files; }</p>
<p># enable programmable completion features (you don&#8217;t need to enable<br />
# this, if it&#8217;s already enabled in /etc/bash.bashrc and /etc/profile<br />
# sources /etc/bash.bashrc).<br />
if [ -f /etc/bash_completion ]; then<br />
    . /etc/bash_completion<br />
fi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
