<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu stable updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/seb128/2008/01/28/ubuntu-stable-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/seb128/2008/01/28/ubuntu-stable-updates/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DJ Saltarelli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/seb128/2008/01/28/ubuntu-stable-updates/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Saltarelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/seb128/2008/01/28/ubuntu-stable-updates/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally for it.  The only problem I see is that it could dramatically increase the traffic to update sites, but I&#039;m not too familiar with the gnome package sizes these days.

/djs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally for it.  The only problem I see is that it could dramatically increase the traffic to update sites, but I&#8217;m not too familiar with the gnome package sizes these days.</p>
<p>/djs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abstract nonsense &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Distributions &#38; stable releases</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/seb128/2008/01/28/ubuntu-stable-updates/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Abstract nonsense &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Distributions &#38; stable releases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/seb128/2008/01/28/ubuntu-stable-updates/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] Sebastien, I see no problem if distributions don&#8217;t update stable releases that fast : let them do what they want. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sebastien, I see no problem if distributions don&#8217;t update stable releases that fast : let them do what they want. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Trausch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/seb128/2008/01/28/ubuntu-stable-updates/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Trausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/seb128/2008/01/28/ubuntu-stable-updates/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Are you aware of any plans for a rolling release for Ubuntu?  I know that there was once talk of the Grumpy Groundhog as a rolling development distribution, but that never seemed to materialize as far as I can tell.  Is there a chance that either that or a stable-ish rolling release would be established at some point?  Just curious, because having some sort of rolling release that more technical users could work with would be able to identify and clear up issues more quickly, possibly even before releases because the infrastructure could be changed just enough that the periodic releases would come from the rolling ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you aware of any plans for a rolling release for Ubuntu?  I know that there was once talk of the Grumpy Groundhog as a rolling development distribution, but that never seemed to materialize as far as I can tell.  Is there a chance that either that or a stable-ish rolling release would be established at some point?  Just curious, because having some sort of rolling release that more technical users could work with would be able to identify and clear up issues more quickly, possibly even before releases because the infrastructure could be changed just enough that the periodic releases would come from the rolling ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
