Comments on: Things we’re working on… http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/ Just another GNOME Blogs weblog Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:59:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: test http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/comment-page-1/#comment-5 test Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/#comment-5 testing<p/>dont want email address published, and your form doesn't say if it will be testing

dont want email address published, and your form doesn’t say if it will be

]]> By: Martin Kretzschmar http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Martin Kretzschmar Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/#comment-6 It would be nice if the permalinks for individual entries would not only hide the .cgi and ? cruft, but also use the title and not a small number for the last part of the uri (i.e. this entry would become <a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on">http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on</a> )<p/>(Obligatory links: <a href="http://mpt.phrasewise.com/2003/05/02">http://mpt.phrasewise.com/2003/05/02</a> and <a href="http://mpt.phrasewise.com/2003/07/26">http://mpt.phrasewise.com/2003/07/26</a>) It would be nice if the permalinks for individual entries would not only hide the .cgi and ? cruft, but also use the title and not a small number for the last part of the uri (i.e. this entry would become http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on )

(Obligatory links: http://mpt.phrasewise.com/2003/05/02 and http://mpt.phrasewise.com/2003/07/26)

]]> By: sean http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/comment-page-1/#comment-7 sean Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/#comment-7 What is it that NewsBruiser provides that Blosxom and PyBlosxom don't? What other blog tools did you consider and why didn't they make the mark? I'd like to know. What is it that NewsBruiser provides that Blosxom and PyBlosxom don’t? What other blog tools did you consider and why didn’t they make the mark? I’d like to know.

]]> By: sean http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/comment-page-1/#comment-8 sean Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/#comment-8 Oops, I commented on the wrong post. Oops, I commented on the wrong post.

]]> By: Morten Welinder http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Morten Welinder Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/seth/2005/05/09/things-were-working-on/#comment-9 preview == save as draft. Works fine.<br/> preview == save as draft. Works fine.

]]>