<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camera Wanted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/</link>
	<description>Fourteen hours to save the Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:45:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C.M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>C.M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I bought a Canon EOS 1000D six months ago as my first SLR and couldn&#039;t be more happy with it. Great price, really good battery time (500-600 images per charge) and not so heavy. The standard 18-55 lens that comes with it has an image stabilizer that the D400/D450 didn&#039;t have when they were new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a Canon EOS 1000D six months ago as my first SLR and couldn&#8217;t be more happy with it. Great price, really good battery time (500-600 images per charge) and not so heavy. The standard 18-55 lens that comes with it has an image stabilizer that the D400/D450 didn&#8217;t have when they were new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Kost</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Kost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-188</guid>
		<description>If you have a kinf-of recent canon powershot, try this
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK
before you buy a new one :) I have a A720 IS and with that firmware it becamer much more powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a kinf-of recent canon powershot, try this<br />
<a href="http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK" rel="nofollow">http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK</a><br />
before you buy a new one <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I have a A720 IS and with that firmware it becamer much more powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 04:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-187</guid>
		<description>I had previously only played with compact digital cameras, and picked up a Canon EOS 450D (what the XSi is known as outside the US) last year.  I&#039;ve been quite happy with it so far.

Using the fully automatic mode, it is about as easy to use as a compact digital but you&#039;ll end up taking much better pictures.  And there are a number of options between full auto and full manual, so it is quite easy to experiment with.  The viewfinder and screen on the back are particularly nice too for a camera of its price.

You&#039;ll probably find similar features on the other brand cameras too, but the entry level Canon ones are quire nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had previously only played with compact digital cameras, and picked up a Canon EOS 450D (what the XSi is known as outside the US) last year.  I&#8217;ve been quite happy with it so far.</p>
<p>Using the fully automatic mode, it is about as easy to use as a compact digital but you&#8217;ll end up taking much better pictures.  And there are a number of options between full auto and full manual, so it is quite easy to experiment with.  The viewfinder and screen on the back are particularly nice too for a camera of its price.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll probably find similar features on the other brand cameras too, but the entry level Canon ones are quire nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Cutler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Cutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Shaun, I bought a Canon XTi 2 or 3 years ago, and love it.  I&#039;m no photo nut, but we wanted a SLR for the speed, as we always seemed to be missing the kids moments by just a second.

I would echo Behdad&#039;s comments, especially if you buy the XSi, which is just an updated version of the XTi and get the $80 lens - the reviews are phenomenal and it&#039;s a big upgrade over the standard lens that comes in the kit.  I have that and a telephoto lens, and am a happy customer.

I didn&#039;t buy  a Nikon as a few years back because I had heard some models had a proprietary RAW format, but I don&#039;t think they do any more.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaun, I bought a Canon XTi 2 or 3 years ago, and love it.  I&#8217;m no photo nut, but we wanted a SLR for the speed, as we always seemed to be missing the kids moments by just a second.</p>
<p>I would echo Behdad&#8217;s comments, especially if you buy the XSi, which is just an updated version of the XTi and get the $80 lens &#8211; the reviews are phenomenal and it&#8217;s a big upgrade over the standard lens that comes in the kit.  I have that and a telephoto lens, and am a happy customer.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t buy  a Nikon as a few years back because I had heard some models had a proprietary RAW format, but I don&#8217;t think they do any more.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>asp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 03:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-185</guid>
		<description>http://stores.shop.ebay.com/Olympus-Auctions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://stores.shop.ebay.com/Olympus-Auctions" rel="nofollow">http://stores.shop.ebay.com/Olympus-Auctions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-184</guid>
		<description>I currently use Pentax gear, because the Pentax K##[#]D series of cameras uses the K mount lenses that I&#039;ve had for my K1000 and other cameras for several decades. That said, since you are looking to buy all new gear, I would go to a camera store, indicate you are looking for a 10-15 megapixel dslr with a decent 30-70 mm f2.0 zoom lens (with some play on either end of the zoom) for under $1000 from either Nikon or Cannon.

The lens does not need to be from the camera manufacturer, but does have to use the correct mount for that camera. You may find specific features that are only available with the brand lens, for example Cannon anti-shake control is built into the lens, not the sensor, Pentax anti-shake is in the sensor, not the lens.

As far as name brands, Canon and Nikon are both good brands. I don&#039;t expect Pentax to go away any time soon, or Sony for that matter. In any case, if you have a good quality camera shop in town, you may want to see what they recommend simply because the people there are going to be better able to show you how to get the best out of the camera, and are likely to be more able to perform any service that you are likely to need in the years to come.

I haven&#039;t noticed anyone pointing it out but the camera mount issue is also of concern if you are thinking of upgrading to a higher quality camera down the line. If that D90 looks like something that might be of interest in a year or two, but is currently out of your budget, buying the Rebel now is going to be a problem as the lenses you get for the Canon are not going to work on the Nikon later on. You will be buying all new lenses when you update the camera body.

Have fun. I would advise taking a couple of pocket camera&#039;s as well. I&#039;m pretty sure you are more familiar with them, and that familiarity may allow you to get a shot of something you encounter happening that completes before you remember everything for using the DSLR. And a jpeg of a 5MP (or so) image in the camera is going to give you memories that a 10-20 MP image that isn&#039;t in the camera, certainly won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently use Pentax gear, because the Pentax K##[#]D series of cameras uses the K mount lenses that I&#8217;ve had for my K1000 and other cameras for several decades. That said, since you are looking to buy all new gear, I would go to a camera store, indicate you are looking for a 10-15 megapixel dslr with a decent 30-70 mm f2.0 zoom lens (with some play on either end of the zoom) for under $1000 from either Nikon or Cannon.</p>
<p>The lens does not need to be from the camera manufacturer, but does have to use the correct mount for that camera. You may find specific features that are only available with the brand lens, for example Cannon anti-shake control is built into the lens, not the sensor, Pentax anti-shake is in the sensor, not the lens.</p>
<p>As far as name brands, Canon and Nikon are both good brands. I don&#8217;t expect Pentax to go away any time soon, or Sony for that matter. In any case, if you have a good quality camera shop in town, you may want to see what they recommend simply because the people there are going to be better able to show you how to get the best out of the camera, and are likely to be more able to perform any service that you are likely to need in the years to come.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t noticed anyone pointing it out but the camera mount issue is also of concern if you are thinking of upgrading to a higher quality camera down the line. If that D90 looks like something that might be of interest in a year or two, but is currently out of your budget, buying the Rebel now is going to be a problem as the lenses you get for the Canon are not going to work on the Nikon later on. You will be buying all new lenses when you update the camera body.</p>
<p>Have fun. I would advise taking a couple of pocket camera&#8217;s as well. I&#8217;m pretty sure you are more familiar with them, and that familiarity may allow you to get a shot of something you encounter happening that completes before you remember everything for using the DSLR. And a jpeg of a 5MP (or so) image in the camera is going to give you memories that a 10-20 MP image that isn&#8217;t in the camera, certainly won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gentle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gentle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Also, I thought I&#039;d add that I&#039;d recommend this book: http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Photography-Book-2/dp/0321524764/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1242442267&amp;sr=1-1

I have the first edition, and it&#039;s really good (cheap too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I thought I&#8217;d add that I&#8217;d recommend this book: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Photography-Book-2/dp/0321524764/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1242442267&amp;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Photography-Book-2/dp/0321524764/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1242442267&amp;sr=1-1</a></p>
<p>I have the first edition, and it&#8217;s really good (cheap too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gentle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gentle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d probably go for something like a Nikon D90 (I have the D80, and it&#039;s awesome)... The lower end ones (D40 and D60) I don&#039;t really like because they don&#039;t have a little dedicated LCD on top for info like the f-stop, shutter speed, white balance, iso etc. but that&#039;s really just personal preference. Also, I think the lower end ones are a bit too small - the D80/90 and D300 just feel better to me, and are a bit heavier, which makes it easier to hold steady. If you don&#039;t mind that though, the lower end ones are still very good cameras.

But, like everyone else said, it&#039;s all about lenses - while the lens that comes with the camera (if you buy a kit) is likely very good outside with lots of light, you&#039;re not going to get that good photos indoors at night. For photographing people indoors at close range, a 50mm f/1.8 lens is a very good and extremely economical ($100 - $200) option, but it limits your framing options a little.

Lastly, I&#039;d recommend getting a real flash if you are interested in taking a lot of photos indoors - the ones on the camera don&#039;t usually look that good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d probably go for something like a Nikon D90 (I have the D80, and it&#8217;s awesome)&#8230; The lower end ones (D40 and D60) I don&#8217;t really like because they don&#8217;t have a little dedicated LCD on top for info like the f-stop, shutter speed, white balance, iso etc. but that&#8217;s really just personal preference. Also, I think the lower end ones are a bit too small &#8211; the D80/90 and D300 just feel better to me, and are a bit heavier, which makes it easier to hold steady. If you don&#8217;t mind that though, the lower end ones are still very good cameras.</p>
<p>But, like everyone else said, it&#8217;s all about lenses &#8211; while the lens that comes with the camera (if you buy a kit) is likely very good outside with lots of light, you&#8217;re not going to get that good photos indoors at night. For photographing people indoors at close range, a 50mm f/1.8 lens is a very good and extremely economical ($100 &#8211; $200) option, but it limits your framing options a little.</p>
<p>Lastly, I&#8217;d recommend getting a real flash if you are interested in taking a lot of photos indoors &#8211; the ones on the camera don&#8217;t usually look that good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico Mena Quintero</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico Mena Quintero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-181</guid>
		<description>For the record, I bought my camera/lens at Amazon (it was slightly cheaper than B&amp;H Photo, which was a surprise).

Get this book: http://www.amazon.com/Photography-Barbara-London/dp/0321011082

And you&#039;ll know everything you&#039;ll ever need to know :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I bought my camera/lens at Amazon (it was slightly cheaper than B&amp;H Photo, which was a surprise).</p>
<p>Get this book: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Photography-Barbara-London/dp/0321011082" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Photography-Barbara-London/dp/0321011082</a></p>
<p>And you&#8217;ll know everything you&#8217;ll ever need to know <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: behdad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/05/15/camera-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>behdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=124#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Go for the Rebel XSi.  It&#039;s rather cheap, and a fantastic piece of a hardware.  Then read the manual back to back and you&#039;re ready to go.  I go as far as suggesting that you buy the body only and then stock it with a lens of your choice.  My recommendation? The dirt cheap Canon 50mm f/1.8 II lens that you can buy for some $80.  It&#039;s not a zoom lens, but since I got it, I&#039;ve not my &quot;kit&quot; lens at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go for the Rebel XSi.  It&#8217;s rather cheap, and a fantastic piece of a hardware.  Then read the manual back to back and you&#8217;re ready to go.  I go as far as suggesting that you buy the body only and then stock it with a lens of your choice.  My recommendation? The dirt cheap Canon 50mm f/1.8 II lens that you can buy for some $80.  It&#8217;s not a zoom lens, but since I got it, I&#8217;ve not my &#8220;kit&#8221; lens at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
