<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yelp Live Help</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/</link>
	<description>Fourteen hours to save the Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-255</guid>
		<description>This is a neat idea, Shaun.  The part that concerns me about the live help is the, &quot;hopefully populated with people who want to help,&quot; part.  Unless this was done via IRC, I think we&#039;d have a rough go of it.  As it is now, getting live support in IRC can be pretty hit-or-miss, and new users are prone to join a channel, ask a question, and then leave if they don&#039;t get some kind of direct response within 30 seconds or so.  

Moreover, I think asking people who normally idle/assist users in IRC to also idle/assist users in another real-time messaging format might be a tough nut to crack.  

As for the comments and such . . .  It sounds interesting.  I agree with others&#039; concerns about how to handle comment spam and internationalization issues.  As a point of reference for help feedback, it might be worth looking at some sample Gmail help topics: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6593  You&#039;re being all visionary and cool, though, while I&#039;m just saying, &quot;Let&#039;s see what other folks do.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a neat idea, Shaun.  The part that concerns me about the live help is the, &#8220;hopefully populated with people who want to help,&#8221; part.  Unless this was done via IRC, I think we&#8217;d have a rough go of it.  As it is now, getting live support in IRC can be pretty hit-or-miss, and new users are prone to join a channel, ask a question, and then leave if they don&#8217;t get some kind of direct response within 30 seconds or so.  </p>
<p>Moreover, I think asking people who normally idle/assist users in IRC to also idle/assist users in another real-time messaging format might be a tough nut to crack.  </p>
<p>As for the comments and such . . .  It sounds interesting.  I agree with others&#8217; concerns about how to handle comment spam and internationalization issues.  As a point of reference for help feedback, it might be worth looking at some sample Gmail help topics: <a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6593" rel="nofollow">http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6593</a>  You&#8217;re being all visionary and cool, though, while I&#8217;m just saying, &#8220;Let&#8217;s see what other folks do.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixternal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>nixternal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-249</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what all the Ubuntu side does to the docs and patching. Hopefully they do like we do on the Kubuntu side. We keep the KDE docs as they are and we just add out docs that work together.

Now, with that said though, and I don&#039;t know how GNOME is, but I know in KDE it gets annoying when distros patch and it is their fault. There are quite a few bugs like this in KDE Bugzilla, and I am willing to bet the same goes for GNOME. See, this would be a tricky part, because a part of me says yeah, have Ubuntu patch to point to #ubuntu and the other half is no, don&#039;t patch, keep them going to #gnome or whatever.

Figuring this whole thing out will be a blast though :)  How about working with the OpenDesktop social API that they put out and have been having the competitions for? That might be something to keep in the back of your mind too during the planning phase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what all the Ubuntu side does to the docs and patching. Hopefully they do like we do on the Kubuntu side. We keep the KDE docs as they are and we just add out docs that work together.</p>
<p>Now, with that said though, and I don&#8217;t know how GNOME is, but I know in KDE it gets annoying when distros patch and it is their fault. There are quite a few bugs like this in KDE Bugzilla, and I am willing to bet the same goes for GNOME. See, this would be a tricky part, because a part of me says yeah, have Ubuntu patch to point to #ubuntu and the other half is no, don&#8217;t patch, keep them going to #gnome or whatever.</p>
<p>Figuring this whole thing out will be a blast though <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   How about working with the OpenDesktop social API that they put out and have been having the competitions for? That might be something to keep in the back of your mind too during the planning phase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaunm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>shaunm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Man, everybody&#039;s all over the MonkeyChat.  To me, the chat is the carrier for what I think is more interesting, which is the help viewer integration.  It&#039;s not mind-numbingly innovative stuff, but I think the technical side is interestingly novel.  It&#039;s combining a lot of old ideas in a new way.

The social side is much harder.  Rodney, thanks for your input on IRC.  A lot of thought would have to go into how we ensure there are regular (and knowledgeable) helpers, and that users actually get responses to their questions.

And I don&#039;t develop Gnome-only solutions.  The way I was envisioning it, help pages would need to declare a help channel.  So if, for instance, the Gnumeric community wanted to provide live help, they could set up their own channel and point their help pages to that.  Or if there were language-specific channels, the translated help pages would point to them.

That said, I think it would be a real shame if Ubuntu patched all our documents to point their users to their own channels. That&#039;s very divisive, and having major distros do that would kill any upstream help-community efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, everybody&#8217;s all over the MonkeyChat.  To me, the chat is the carrier for what I think is more interesting, which is the help viewer integration.  It&#8217;s not mind-numbingly innovative stuff, but I think the technical side is interestingly novel.  It&#8217;s combining a lot of old ideas in a new way.</p>
<p>The social side is much harder.  Rodney, thanks for your input on IRC.  A lot of thought would have to go into how we ensure there are regular (and knowledgeable) helpers, and that users actually get responses to their questions.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t develop Gnome-only solutions.  The way I was envisioning it, help pages would need to declare a help channel.  So if, for instance, the Gnumeric community wanted to provide live help, they could set up their own channel and point their help pages to that.  Or if there were language-specific channels, the translated help pages would point to them.</p>
<p>That said, I think it would be a real shame if Ubuntu patched all our documents to point their users to their own channels. That&#8217;s very divisive, and having major distros do that would kill any upstream help-community efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Dawes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Dawes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-247</guid>
		<description>This sounds familiar... go install Ximian Desktop 2 (though I guess the IRC server is no more, so monkeychat won&#039;t actually do anything).

I&#039;m guessing that your thoughts were leaning pretty much in the same direction of implementation (though hopefully you wouldn&#039;t be hacking up xchat, but instead using telepathy). It really didn&#039;t work out all that well in XD2. There were a few people who hang out helped people, but there wasn&#039;t really any incentive to do it. Maybe if GNOME had some paid support staff, and if there was a way for downstreams to integrate it into their systems, and their support staff could use it (so users of Ubuntu would get help from Ubuntu people, etc...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds familiar&#8230; go install Ximian Desktop 2 (though I guess the IRC server is no more, so monkeychat won&#8217;t actually do anything).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that your thoughts were leaning pretty much in the same direction of implementation (though hopefully you wouldn&#8217;t be hacking up xchat, but instead using telepathy). It really didn&#8217;t work out all that well in XD2. There were a few people who hang out helped people, but there wasn&#8217;t really any incentive to do it. Maybe if GNOME had some paid support staff, and if there was a way for downstreams to integrate it into their systems, and their support staff could use it (so users of Ubuntu would get help from Ubuntu people, etc&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaunm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>shaunm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-246</guid>
		<description>nixternal, the big problem with comments I haven&#039;t figured out how to solve is how to keep them from getting stale.  Let&#039;s say you add a warning in a comment.  The docs team sees this comment that thinks it&#039;s worthwhile, so they incorporate it directly into the help.  Now the comment is redundant.  Maybe we could have a way for priveleged users to remove comments (might be necessary anyway to remove abusive comments or spam).  Or maybe comments could just auto-expire after some set amount of time.

Maciej, very good question.  I was thinking the same thing myself before bed last night.  For comments, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s feasible for us to translate all users&#039; comments.  I tend to think of comments as stopgaps.  That is, if a comment is worthwhile, it&#039;s worth incorporating that information into future versions of the help.  At the least, it&#039;s no worse from a localization perspective than the multitude of support forums one finds on the Internet.

For the chat itself, we could have separate channels for different languages.  This only works if a language has enough users to keep a channel alive.  The big problem I foresee is that it will be hard for the docs team to incorporate non-English comments back into the main help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nixternal, the big problem with comments I haven&#8217;t figured out how to solve is how to keep them from getting stale.  Let&#8217;s say you add a warning in a comment.  The docs team sees this comment that thinks it&#8217;s worthwhile, so they incorporate it directly into the help.  Now the comment is redundant.  Maybe we could have a way for priveleged users to remove comments (might be necessary anyway to remove abusive comments or spam).  Or maybe comments could just auto-expire after some set amount of time.</p>
<p>Maciej, very good question.  I was thinking the same thing myself before bed last night.  For comments, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s feasible for us to translate all users&#8217; comments.  I tend to think of comments as stopgaps.  That is, if a comment is worthwhile, it&#8217;s worth incorporating that information into future versions of the help.  At the least, it&#8217;s no worse from a localization perspective than the multitude of support forums one finds on the Internet.</p>
<p>For the chat itself, we could have separate channels for different languages.  This only works if a language has enough users to keep a channel alive.  The big problem I foresee is that it will be hard for the docs team to incorporate non-English comments back into the main help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaunm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>shaunm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Eric, great comments, thanks.  We definitely need to be careful of asshats ruining it for everybody else.  Maybe we just need semi-active moderators with kick powers.  I was contemplating having some sort of &quot;thanks&quot; system, where users could gain thanks points when they help people.  I can&#039;t think of any way to make the system not gameable though.

Henri, that looks interesting.  I&#039;ll give it a read.  Is anybody using Open Collaboration Services right now?

Alex, well yes, yes they did.  But AFAIR, it was really just a stripped down IRC client that went to a pre-defined channel.  And that&#039;s not bad on its own.  It can mean users who otherwise have no idea what IRC is can still find your IRC support channels.  But I&#039;m trying to think just a bit bigger.  I&#039;d be interested to hear about people&#039;s experiences with Ximians chat thing though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, great comments, thanks.  We definitely need to be careful of asshats ruining it for everybody else.  Maybe we just need semi-active moderators with kick powers.  I was contemplating having some sort of &#8220;thanks&#8221; system, where users could gain thanks points when they help people.  I can&#8217;t think of any way to make the system not gameable though.</p>
<p>Henri, that looks interesting.  I&#8217;ll give it a read.  Is anybody using Open Collaboration Services right now?</p>
<p>Alex, well yes, yes they did.  But AFAIR, it was really just a stripped down IRC client that went to a pre-defined channel.  And that&#8217;s not bad on its own.  It can mean users who otherwise have no idea what IRC is can still find your IRC support channels.  But I&#8217;m trying to think just a bit bigger.  I&#8217;d be interested to hear about people&#8217;s experiences with Ximians chat thing though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Have you considered setting up a wiki so that everybody can write the help online, in addition to posting helpful comments? I reckon communities can be far more efficient in that regard if the cost of editing is low - especially if we want to address comments that were made by modifying the docs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you considered setting up a wiki so that everybody can write the help online, in addition to posting helpful comments? I reckon communities can be far more efficient in that regard if the cost of editing is low &#8211; especially if we want to address comments that were made by modifying the docs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier Jardón</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Jardón</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Really great idea, 

I filled a related bug for devhelp some time ago: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580246

Also, there are some related work here:

http://live.gnome.org/LiveDocumentationEditing

and here

http://live.gnome.org/DocumentationProject/StatusTracking

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great idea, </p>
<p>I filled a related bug for devhelp some time ago: <a href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580246" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580246</a></p>
<p>Also, there are some related work here:</p>
<p><a href="http://live.gnome.org/LiveDocumentationEditing" rel="nofollow">http://live.gnome.org/LiveDocumentationEditing</a></p>
<p>and here</p>
<p><a href="http://live.gnome.org/DocumentationProject/StatusTracking" rel="nofollow">http://live.gnome.org/DocumentationProject/StatusTracking</a></p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Kinda reminds me of those MSDN document pages, myself.  Those don&#039;t have live chat though...

MSDN Live?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda reminds me of those MSDN document pages, myself.  Those don&#8217;t have live chat though&#8230;</p>
<p>MSDN Live?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maciej Piechotka</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Piechotka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/?p=184#comment-241</guid>
		<description>What with l10n issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What with l10n issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/shaunm/2009/09/28/yelp-live-help/feed/ ) in 1.19725 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 11:12 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 12:12 am UTC -->
