<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using the wrong tool for the right job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/snark/2008/10/30/using-the-wrong-tool-for-the-right-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/snark/2008/10/30/using-the-wrong-tool-for-the-right-job/</link>
	<description>Snark's gnome blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Snark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/snark/2008/10/30/using-the-wrong-tool-for-the-right-job/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/snark/?p=45#comment-95</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s so bad is that C++ was already a Frankenstein language -- and it&#039;s becoming worse and worse as time goes on.

If you read that post, you get the impression that doing lambdas is complex and guru-esque -- while it has been simple and basic in many other languages.

Did I mention that it&#039;s the *future* C++ while those other languages are pretty old? It&#039;s disgusting : people like crap. They even crave for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s so bad is that C++ was already a Frankenstein language &#8212; and it&#8217;s becoming worse and worse as time goes on.</p>
<p>If you read that post, you get the impression that doing lambdas is complex and guru-esque &#8212; while it has been simple and basic in many other languages.</p>
<p>Did I mention that it&#8217;s the *future* C++ while those other languages are pretty old? It&#8217;s disgusting : people like crap. They even crave for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otte</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/snark/2008/10/30/using-the-wrong-tool-for-the-right-job/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>otte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/snark/?p=45#comment-94</guid>
		<description>So for all the readers that don&#039;t get C++ (like me), what&#039;s so bad about it?
That MS implements it before gcc?
That C++ looks more like perl than C now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So for all the readers that don&#8217;t get C++ (like me), what&#8217;s so bad about it?<br />
That MS implements it before gcc?<br />
That C++ looks more like perl than C now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
