Comments on: UI Improvements in Evolution 2.8 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/ My personal weblog on my work in GNOME Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:35:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 By: Rob Adams http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-123 Rob Adams Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-123 Sexy. I love the cairo work; it's low-key and nicely designed. Sexy. I love the cairo work; it’s low-key and nicely designed.

]]> By: Rafael Jannone http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-124 Rafael Jannone Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-124 Cairo stuff looks cool :)<p/>One small doubt: isn't the appointment cell lacking a little bit of padding? I think it would be easier on the eyes, more relaxed...<p/>Good job! Cairo stuff looks cool :)

One small doubt: isn’t the appointment cell lacking a little bit of padding? I think it would be easier on the eyes, more relaxed…

Good job!

]]> By: andre http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-125 andre Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-125 i can just say: let's get rid of bonobo. the faster, the better. you know of the bugs that are currently blocked by our bonobo dependency. i can just say: let’s get rid of bonobo. the faster, the better. you know of the bugs that are currently blocked by our bonobo dependency.

]]> By: Dan Derozier http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-126 Dan Derozier Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-126 Are there plans to finish making all of the evolution icons tango-compatible? Are there plans to finish making all of the evolution icons tango-compatible?

]]> By: C.J. http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-127 C.J. Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-127 When will it be in ubuntu? When will it be in ubuntu?

]]> By: Pti-seb http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-128 Pti-seb Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-128 Good job !!! Good job !!!

]]> By: FunkyM http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-129 FunkyM Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-129 As noted padding of the calendar items seems a bit odd and the style could be a little bit less fancy. A much simpler style should be preferred aswell.<p/>Asides, I would say that there are useability issues in Evolution that should get a higher priority to be fixed than adding graphical updates.<p/>A simple example of one of them is the inability to move calendar items in all calendar views. (Especially in the month view)<p/>Anyways, keep up the great work! As noted padding of the calendar items seems a bit odd and the style could be a little bit less fancy. A much simpler style should be preferred aswell.

Asides, I would say that there are useability issues in Evolution that should get a higher priority to be fixed than adding graphical updates.

A simple example of one of them is the inability to move calendar items in all calendar views. (Especially in the month view)

Anyways, keep up the great work!

]]> By: Robert http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-130 Robert Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-130 Looks nice - not sure the drop shadow makes sense.<p/>Also, if the appointments are supposed to be semitransparent, something with that opacity wouldn't project a shadow that dark. I think that's why it looks a bit wrong. Looks nice – not sure the drop shadow makes sense.

Also, if the appointments are supposed to be semitransparent, something with that opacity wouldn’t project a shadow that dark. I think that’s why it looks a bit wrong.

]]> By: Srag http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-131 Srag Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-131 Rafael Jannone: I didnt understand your point on the padding. Can you explain me a bit? Rafael Jannone: I didnt understand your point on the padding. Can you explain me a bit?

]]> By: Frank Paul Silye http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/comment-page-1/#comment-132 Frank Paul Silye Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2006/07/19/ui-improvements-in-evolution-28/#comment-132 Looks really nice, but why not focus on adding support for changing server port numbers, so that users that works at companies that don't use standard port numbers can actually use the client?<p/>I cannot use this client even when you have implemented Cairo rendering... Looks really nice, but why not focus on adding support for changing server port numbers, so that users that works at companies that don’t use standard port numbers can actually use the client?

I cannot use this client even when you have implemented Cairo rendering…

]]>