Comments on: Evolution 2.24.4 released

By: Gregory Stec

Gregory Stec — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:05:18 +0000

Hi,

What about Windows installer for latest version? I there any plans on regular update Windows installer (in sync with sources release)? That is completely horrible and unacceptable for Windows users to self compile or manually install Evolution from tens of binary packages ( zip files)…

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:31:52 +0000

Hi!

Don’t hit me, but is there any plan to update the Windows port? The only somewhat recent release that I can find is the one hosted by you, announced here:

http://blogs.gnome.org/sragavan/2008/10/03/evolution-224-windows-port/

I’d love to give a recent version of Evolution a try so that I can drop Outlook once and for all even at work.

By: Alex Butenko

Alex Butenko — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:47:27 +0000

Glad to hear. About 2 month ago i just switched to gmail webmail, coz its just impossible to use evolution.

I hope u will hunt down memleaks as well as speed issue. Coz now it leaks a lot.

By: Larry Reaves

Larry Reaves — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:51:17 +0000

Hey, I just wanted to say thanks for all the hard work… Sometimes progress is painful at first. So thanks for making evolution rock once again.

By: Simon

Simon — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:53:55 +0000

FYI, I was unable to actually build e-d-s from the release tarball, owing to some gtk-doc related problems – the install process refers to $(GTKDOC_REBASE), which is never defined anywhere, causing the install to fail with ‘–relative: command not found’.

I read somewhere that eog had the same problem, and had to put out a new release for it… I think it was relating to the gtk-doc version on the machine the release was made on.