<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Stefan Westerfeld's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME Blogs weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 26.03.2008 Commercial BEAST support available by open source fan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/03/26/26032008-commercial-beast-support-available/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>open source fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/03/26/26032008-commercial-beast-support-available/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>yeah, if you need to do this, then you have no community. if you have no community, something about strategy is wrong ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, if you need to do this, then you have no community. if you have no community, something about strategy is wrong ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 05.03.2008 My Job at MCS by Götz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/03/05/05032008-my-job-at-mcs/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Götz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/03/05/05032008-my-job-at-mcs/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>We have a lot of SUN hardware bought from MCS. I think I can mostly blame SUN for the support troubles and not your colleagues :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a lot of SUN hardware bought from MCS. I think I can mostly blame SUN for the support troubles and not your colleagues <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' width='16' height='16' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 27.02.2008 Black is beautiful - green is essential by Götz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/27/27022008-black-is-beautiful-green-is-essential/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Götz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/27/27022008-black-is-beautiful-green-is-essential/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Wer hat uns verraten?
Die Sozialdemokraten.
Wer verrät uns noch schneller?
Grüne und ALer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wer hat uns verraten?<br />
Die Sozialdemokraten.<br />
Wer verrät uns noch schneller?<br />
Grüne und ALer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 27.02.2008 Black is beautiful - green is essential by blah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/27/27022008-black-is-beautiful-green-is-essential/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/27/27022008-black-is-beautiful-green-is-essential/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Du findest also die Hochschulpolitik des CDU-Senats so geil? Oder das Kraftwerk Moorburg? Oder? Oder? Oder? Oh, mann.

Sicherlich, wenn die heute doch sehr neoliberalen Grünen, die ohnehin nur noch ne bessere FDP sind, mit den ohnehin neoliberalen CDUlern zusammengehen, dann ist das nur natürlich. Aber ist es auch gut?

Nein! Weil eine CDU an der Macht immer doof ist, egal ob nun ein weichgewaschener Ole von Beust ihr vorsteht oder ein Law-And-Order-Freund und Ausländerhasser namens Roland Koch.

Vergiss auch nie, daß es sich um die selbe CDU handelt, die mit Freuden mit Schill zusammengearbeitet haben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Du findest also die Hochschulpolitik des CDU-Senats so geil? Oder das Kraftwerk Moorburg? Oder? Oder? Oder? Oh, mann.</p>
<p>Sicherlich, wenn die heute doch sehr neoliberalen Grünen, die ohnehin nur noch ne bessere FDP sind, mit den ohnehin neoliberalen CDUlern zusammengehen, dann ist das nur natürlich. Aber ist es auch gut?</p>
<p>Nein! Weil eine CDU an der Macht immer doof ist, egal ob nun ein weichgewaschener Ole von Beust ihr vorsteht oder ein Law-And-Order-Freund und Ausländerhasser namens Roland Koch.</p>
<p>Vergiss auch nie, daß es sich um die selbe CDU handelt, die mit Freuden mit Schill zusammengearbeitet haben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 27.02.2008 Black is beautiful - green is essential by Mathias Hasselmann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/27/27022008-black-is-beautiful-green-is-essential/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias Hasselmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/27/27022008-black-is-beautiful-green-is-essential/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Yes,

I also hope to see CDU+GAL happening in Hamburg. I absolutely do not see why large portions of GAL insist that the SPD is their only possible coalition partner: Such a attitude is kind anti-democratic, and also is some kind of self-deception: Preserving the environment definitely is a conservative goal by the definition of the word conservative. Also the CDU is highly competent regarding social aspects. It really sucks, that the CDU is confused with the hyper-liberal  (better "egoistic"?) FDP regarding that topic. It sucks even more, that SPD, Die Linke and portions of Die Grünen deny the fact, that you have to earn money first, before you can spread it for social projects.

Even the fields of difference make sense: Both parties take extreme positions regarding  power generation, foreigner's integration, school system. Extreme positions (aka. "Black and White") most of the time are bad positions in my experience, so forcing both parties to find compromises regarding that topics, only can be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,</p>
<p>I also hope to see CDU+GAL happening in Hamburg. I absolutely do not see why large portions of GAL insist that the SPD is their only possible coalition partner: Such a attitude is kind anti-democratic, and also is some kind of self-deception: Preserving the environment definitely is a conservative goal by the definition of the word conservative. Also the CDU is highly competent regarding social aspects. It really sucks, that the CDU is confused with the hyper-liberal  (better &#8220;egoistic&#8221;?) FDP regarding that topic. It sucks even more, that SPD, Die Linke and portions of Die Grünen deny the fact, that you have to earn money first, before you can spread it for social projects.</p>
<p>Even the fields of difference make sense: Both parties take extreme positions regarding  power generation, foreigner&#8217;s integration, school system. Extreme positions (aka. &#8220;Black and White&#8221;) most of the time are bad positions in my experience, so forcing both parties to find compromises regarding that topics, only can be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 03.02.2008 LibSydney and PulseAudio development by Stefan Westerfeld</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/03/03022008-libsydney-and-pulseaudio-development/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Westerfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/03/03022008-libsydney-and-pulseaudio-development/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&#62; Can’t do object orientation in C? Tell that to the people who wrote GObject.

I have not said that it is not possible to do object oriented programming in C. I just said that it is suboptimal, because the language does not support it. And I know Tim Janik who wrote lots of GObject code - we have studied at the University of Hamburg together; and we are both working on BEAST.

Since we started using C++ in BEAST, we see that the amount of source code you need to write to implement a plugin, a widget or some other part of the program is usually quite a bit smaller than the C code. So I am not saying that you cannot do object orientation in C (GIMP for instance is an excellent object oriented application written in C); my point is only that coding the same functionality in C++ is less work than in doing it in plain C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Can’t do object orientation in C? Tell that to the people who wrote GObject.</p>
<p>I have not said that it is not possible to do object oriented programming in C. I just said that it is suboptimal, because the language does not support it. And I know Tim Janik who wrote lots of GObject code - we have studied at the University of Hamburg together; and we are both working on BEAST.</p>
<p>Since we started using C++ in BEAST, we see that the amount of source code you need to write to implement a plugin, a widget or some other part of the program is usually quite a bit smaller than the C code. So I am not saying that you cannot do object orientation in C (GIMP for instance is an excellent object oriented application written in C); my point is only that coding the same functionality in C++ is less work than in doing it in plain C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 03.02.2008 LibSydney and PulseAudio development by Jens Munk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/03/03022008-libsydney-and-pulseaudio-development/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Munk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/03/03022008-libsydney-and-pulseaudio-development/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Ups

Never seen this syntax before. Just tested the source using gdb. No memory is allocated twice.

Sorry for the inconvenience

Jens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ups</p>
<p>Never seen this syntax before. Just tested the source using gdb. No memory is allocated twice.</p>
<p>Sorry for the inconvenience</p>
<p>Jens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 03.02.2008 LibSydney and PulseAudio development by Jens Munk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/03/03022008-libsydney-and-pulseaudio-development/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Munk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/02/03/03022008-libsydney-and-pulseaudio-development/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hi Stefan

I ran across a FIR filter of yours, where you have made a nice templated class for memory alignment. I have a question for you

What is the point in 

malloc'ing

and afterwards

new (data + i) T()

You allocate memory twice. You can equally well allocate an array of struct/class/unions and use the __atribute(aligned(16)).

Cheers
Jens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stefan</p>
<p>I ran across a FIR filter of yours, where you have made a nice templated class for memory alignment. I have a question for you</p>
<p>What is the point in </p>
<p>malloc&#8217;ing</p>
<p>and afterwards</p>
<p>new (data + i) T()</p>
<p>You allocate memory twice. You can equally well allocate an array of struct/class/unions and use the __atribute(aligned(16)).</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Jens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 28.01.2008 Australia Day in Sydney and Melbourne by jean collins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/01/28/28012008-australia-day-in-sydney-and-melbourne/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>jean collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/01/28/28012008-australia-day-in-sydney-and-melbourne/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I thought Sydney had a Sydney Day in April. Does this still happen as I know from information given to me by my husband that he attended Sydney Day in April, 1952. I also have apiccture of this day. Liked your article on Australia Day. Thanks, have a nice day. Jean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Sydney had a Sydney Day in April. Does this still happen as I know from information given to me by my husband that he attended Sydney Day in April, 1952. I also have apiccture of this day. Liked your article on Australia Day. Thanks, have a nice day. Jean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 28.01.2008 Australia Day in Sydney and Melbourne by jean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/01/28/28012008-australia-day-in-sydney-and-melbourne/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/stw/2008/01/28/28012008-australia-day-in-sydney-and-melbourne/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I thought Sydney Day was in April. I know there was a parade there in 1952 as my husband was there. What happened to that celebration day? 
Would be interested to know. Have a nice day. Jean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Sydney Day was in April. I know there was a parade there in 1952 as my husband was there. What happened to that celebration day?<br />
Would be interested to know. Have a nice day. Jean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
