Comments on: Bring Out Your Screenshots! http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/08/25/bring-out-your-screenshots/ My Weblog Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:31:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Pearlgirl http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/08/25/bring-out-your-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-175 Pearlgirl Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/08/25/bring-out-your-screenshots/#comment-175 Thomas is cute! What lovely eyes. Thomas is cute! What lovely eyes.

]]> By: qgil http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/08/25/bring-out-your-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-176 qgil Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/08/25/bring-out-your-screenshots/#comment-176 We probably should insist that screenshots aiming to be featured in the release notes should have the default GNOME 2.16 look, with the Clarius theme and any of the default backgrounds. Unless you come up with an incredible customization, perhaps we would include those in a "Extras" section.<p/>One issue more complex to solve for the average screenshooter is how to show the default GNOME top panel, and not the Edgy with the Ubuntu logo etc. We can always retouch, though... We probably should insist that screenshots aiming to be featured in the release notes should have the default GNOME 2.16 look, with the Clarius theme and any of the default backgrounds. Unless you come up with an incredible customization, perhaps we would include those in a “Extras” section.

One issue more complex to solve for the average screenshooter is how to show the default GNOME top panel, and not the Edgy with the Ubuntu logo etc. We can always retouch, though…

]]> By: Thomas Wood http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/08/25/bring-out-your-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-177 Thomas Wood Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/08/25/bring-out-your-screenshots/#comment-177 qgill: Agreed, we should try and depict GNOME as "stock" as possible in the release notes. Having said that, many people are more likely to see it with Ubuntu/Fedora branding, so it makes sense to include at least one of these too.<p/><br/>Pearlgirl: Thanks you! Have I met you? qgill: Agreed, we should try and depict GNOME as “stock” as possible in the release notes. Having said that, many people are more likely to see it with Ubuntu/Fedora branding, so it makes sense to include at least one of these too.

Pearlgirl: Thanks you! Have I met you?

]]>