<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calling All Patch Critics!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/11/07/calling-all-patch-critics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/11/07/calling-all-patch-critics/</link>
	<description>My Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakub Steiner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/11/07/calling-all-patch-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Steiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/11/07/calling-all-patch-critics/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Good catch. That one is extremely annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch. That one is extremely annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/11/07/calling-all-patch-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/11/07/calling-all-patch-critics/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Speaking of understaffed modules, is GTK+ one of them? Just asking, because I&#039;ve actually submitted a one-byte (yes, byte) patch approximately two monthes ago, and it looks like it&#039;s really hard to review and commit:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356255&quot;&gt;http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356255&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of understaffed modules, is GTK+ one of them? Just asking, because I&#8217;ve actually submitted a one-byte (yes, byte) patch approximately two monthes ago, and it looks like it&#8217;s really hard to review and commit:<br /><a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356255">http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356255</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/thos/2006/11/07/calling-all-patch-critics/feed/ ) in 1.14557 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:19 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:19 pm UTC -->
