<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thomas Wood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos</link>
	<description>My Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fedora 12 Beta &#8211; First Impressions</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/11/02/fedora-12-beta-first-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/11/02/fedora-12-beta-first-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/?p=335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of blog posts about Fedora 12 recently.  It&#8217;s been a while since I last tried Fedora, so I thought I&#8217;d try it out and post some of my thoughts.
Likes

 Sweet KMS enabled boot screen &#8211; very nice
 Yum is fast enough to be usable (but maybe that&#8217;s because of my quad core [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of blog posts about Fedora 12 recently.  It&#8217;s been a while since I last tried Fedora, so I thought I&#8217;d try it out and post some of my thoughts.</p>
<p><strong>Likes</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Sweet KMS enabled boot screen &#8211; very nice
<li> Yum is fast enough to be usable (but maybe that&#8217;s because of my quad core now?)
<li> Custom icons for Documents/Downloads/Music/Videos etc
<li> Installer re-assigned ownership attributes for old home directory. Very handy.
<li> Clearlooks is the default theme (not Nodoka)
<li> Control Center (Preferences) menu is no longer grouped by categories
</ul>
<p><strong>Dislikes</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Notifications (what is that horrible massive black square on my screen)
<li> Package manager UI (often just too confusing, too animated, or too awkward)
<li> Bluetooth keyboard didn&#8217;t work in the final setup screens (setting up username etc&#8230;)
<li> Every other folder in Nautilus tells me I can share it using Personal File Sharing (well, at least $HOME and $HOME/Downloads &#8211; why would I want to share $HOME and why do I have to see this notice all the time?)
<li> Doesn&#8217;t remember my preferred language (en_GB)
</ul>
<p>All in all, looking good apart from the few niggles I&#8217;m sure will be fixed before release. If anyone knows whether there is a meta-package to install enough packages to allow GNOME development (e.g. including gcc, intltool, libtool, gtk-doc, etc), that would be awesome.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> I just found sudo yum install @gnome-devel @development-tools via the <a href="http://live.gnome.org/JhbuildDependencies/FedoraCore">Jhbuild</a> page. It&#8217;s a start, but doesn&#8217;t include everything needed to build GTK+ for example. Shame the package manager UI doesn&#8217;t make this more obvious.</p>
<p><em>Unfortunately, I&#8217;m not going to file bugs just yet, because these are just my first impressions, and I&#8217;m not yet a Fedora user!<!-- of the software and therefore have no interest in seeing these features fixed. Besides, a Fedora using colleague of mine has previously filed bugs and not one of them has been responded to. Sorry.--></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/11/02/fedora-12-beta-first-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GNOME Beers/London</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/10/05/gnome-beerslondon/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/10/05/gnome-beerslondon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/10/05/gnome-beerslondon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luis Villa let us know he was in London this week and asked if anyone was up for a beer (a trick question perhaps?). More than happy to oblige, we&#8217;re going to meet up at our traditional haunt of Ye Olde Cheshire Cheese and then go on for pizza. I&#8217;ve put up the wiki page [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/10/03/london/">Luis Villa</a> let us know he was in London this week and asked if anyone was up for a beer (a trick question perhaps?). More than happy to oblige, we&#8217;re going to meet up at our traditional haunt of Ye Olde Cheshire Cheese and then go on for pizza. I&#8217;ve put up the <a href="http://live.gnome.org/LondonBeer/Version2.6">wiki page</a> to let us know if you&#8217;re coming. All GNOME hackers/contributers/hangers-on welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/10/05/gnome-beerslondon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toolbar Styles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/29/toolbar-styles/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/29/toolbar-styles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been discussing the future of the Interface tab in the Appearance capplet, and we&#8217;d like to &#8220;fix&#8221; the default toolbar style before we consider any changes. It seems not many people are aware of what these styles actually look like, so to help I&#8217;ve done some screenshots:
Text Beside Icons (the proposed new default)

Text Below [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been <a href="http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnomecc-list/2009-July/msg00015.html">discussing</a> the future of the Interface tab in the Appearance capplet, and we&#8217;d like to &#8220;fix&#8221; the default toolbar style before we consider any changes. It seems not many people are aware of what these styles actually look like, so to help I&#8217;ve done some screenshots:</p>
<p>Text Beside Icons (the proposed new default)<br />
<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/text-beside-icons.png"><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/text-beside-icons-300x137.png" alt="text-beside-icons" title="text-beside-icons" width="300" height="137" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-325" /></a></p>
<p>Text Below Icons (the current default)<br />
<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/text-below-icons.png"><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/text-below-icons-300x137.png" alt="text-below-icons" title="text-below-icons" width="300" height="137" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-324" /></a></p>
<p>Icons Only<br />
<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/icons-only.png"><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/icons-only-300x137.png" alt="icons-only" title="icons-only" width="300" height="137" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-323" /></a></p>
<p>Text Only<br />
<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/text-only.png"><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/text-only-300x137.png" alt="text-only" title="text-only" width="300" height="137" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-326" /></a></p>
<p>A trial switch to the text-beside-icons style is underway, so that we can test applications to make sure they work properly with this style. Discussion on any issues can be reported in <a href="http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590143">bug 590143</a>.</p>
<p>Personally, I think there are several advantages to the text-beside-icons mode:</p>
<p>* Increased hit area (fitts law) for important buttons<br />
* Reduced vertical space usage (compared to text-below-icons)<br />
* Reduced horizontal space usage in some applications (as compared to text-below-icons in e.g. Nautilus, Evolution)<br />
* Aesthetically nicer than having text for every item</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/29/toolbar-styles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Adding fonts in GNOME</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/26/re-adding-fonts-in-gnome/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/26/re-adding-fonts-in-gnome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hylke wrote about installing fonts in GNOME and how there isn&#8217;t an easy way to do this at the moment. Since his suggestion was so simple, I got out my editor and spent this evening hacking. It&#8217;s feature freeze tomorrow, so I&#8217;ve pushed the changes into master and any testing would be greatly appreciated!

There are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hylke <a href="http://www.bomahy.nl/hylke/blog/adding-fonts-in-gnome/">wrote about</a> installing fonts in GNOME and how there isn&#8217;t an easy way to do this at the moment. Since his suggestion was so simple, I got out my editor and spent this evening hacking. It&#8217;s feature freeze tomorrow, so I&#8217;ve pushed the changes into master and any testing would be greatly appreciated!</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/07/fontviewerrevamp1.png" alt="Font Viewer Revamp" title="Font Viewer Revamp" width="499" height="276" class="alignright size-full wp-image-317" /></p>
<p>There are probably a few tweaks to be made to padding, etc. Hopefully I can also work out how to get the word wrapping/scrolling they way it needs to be without resorting to fixed sizing (it&#8217;s not as simple as you might think).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/26/re-adding-fonts-in-gnome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London Beer V2.4</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/22/london-beer-v24/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/22/london-beer-v24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/22/london-beer-v24/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note to say another social is being organised in London for this Friday. Open to any GNOME hackers/contributors/hangers on. Sign up and details on the wiki page: http://live.gnome.org/LondonBeer/Version2.4
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note to say another social is being organised in London for this Friday. Open to any GNOME hackers/contributors/hangers on. Sign up and details on the wiki page: <a href="http://live.gnome.org/LondonBeer/Version2.4">http://live.gnome.org/LondonBeer/Version2.4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/22/london-beer-v24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing Turbine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/28/introducing-turbine/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/28/introducing-turbine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/28/introducing-turbine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
My gobject generator project I mentioned a while ago has been named &#8220;Turbine&#8221; (thanks to Charles for the suggestion). I&#8217;ve made a few more improvements and it&#8217;s now available in a GNOME git repository:
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/turbine/
git clone git://git.gnome.org/turbine
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/05/applications-development.png" alt="applications-development" title="applications-development" width="32" height="32" class="alignright size-full wp-image-307" /><br />
My gobject generator project I <a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/15/gobject-generator/">mentioned</a> a while ago has been named &#8220;Turbine&#8221; (thanks to Charles for the suggestion). I&#8217;ve made a few more improvements and it&#8217;s now available in a GNOME git repository:</p>
<p><a href="http://git.gnome.org/cgit/turbine/">http://git.gnome.org/cgit/turbine/</a></p>
<p>git clone git://git.gnome.org/turbine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/28/introducing-turbine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moblin 2.0 User Experience</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/19/moblin-20-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/19/moblin-20-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux/FOSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/19/moblin-20-user-experience/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Moblin User Experience has been announced. Finally we can show people what we&#8217;ve been working on!

Check out the introduction video

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Moblin User Experience has <a href="http://moblin.org/community/blogs/imad/2009/moblin-v20-beta-netbooks-and-nettops-its-here">been announced</a>. Finally we can show people what we&#8217;ve been working on!<br />
<a href="http://moblin.org/community/blogs/imad/2009/moblin-v20-beta-netbooks-and-nettops-its-here"><img border=0 src="http://moblin.org/sites/all/files/imagecache/image_thumb_medium/u4/moblin_v2_netbook_beta.jpg" alt="Moblin 2 UI"/></a></p>
<p>Check out the <a href="http://moblin.org/documentation/moblin-netbook-intro">introduction video</a></p>
<p><object width="425" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vsCpIeLLoT8&#038;rel=0&#038;border=1&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vsCpIeLLoT8&#038;rel=0&#038;border=1&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="349"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/19/moblin-20-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GObject Generator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/15/gobject-generator/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/15/gobject-generator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been recent talk about GObject Generators, so I&#8217;m going to throw my own one into the mix. It&#8217;s based on Ross&#8217; gobject.py, but given a fresh dose of GTK+ and auto completion love.

If you&#8217;d like to try it out, there is a git repository available:
git clone http://gnome.org/~thos/git/gobject-gen.git
I&#8217;d like to move it to GNOME [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been <a href="http://chenthill.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/gobject-skeleton-generators/">recent talk</a> about GObject Generators, so I&#8217;m going to throw my own one into the mix. It&#8217;s based on Ross&#8217; <a href="http://burtonini.com/cgi/gobject.py">gobject.py</a>, but given a fresh dose of GTK+ and auto completion love.</p>
<p><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/05/screenshot-gobject-generator.png" alt="screenshot-gobject-generator" title="screenshot-gobject-generator" width="424" height="486" class="alignright size-full wp-image-298" /></p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to try it out, there is a git repository available:</p>
<p><code>git clone http://gnome.org/~thos/git/gobject-gen.git</code></p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to move it to GNOME git, but before I do it needs a decent project name. Does anyone have any suggestions? Something descriptive but unique, preferably with only 2 syllables.</p>
<p>Kudos to the Anjuta GObject generator for the auto completion idea. Also, before any one suggests it, I know about Vala but we&#8217;re not using it for this project, so it&#8217;s of no use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/05/15/gobject-generator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vim Command of the Day</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/04/23/vim-command-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/04/23/vim-command-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux/FOSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In the office we have two white boards that where going rather underused. Last week I decided to rectify this by drawing FOSS propaganda on one of them. On the same day, Damien (of Shave fame) happened to show us all a new Vim command we hadn&#8217;t used before, so I suggested we start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/files/2009/04/vim-editor_logo_bigger.png" alt="vim-editor_logo_bigger" title="vim-editor_logo_bigger" width="73" height="73" align=right class="alignright size-full wp-image-288" /> In the office we have two white boards that where going rather underused. Last week I decided to rectify this by drawing FOSS propaganda on one of them. On the same day, <a href="http://damien.lespiau.name/blog/">Damien</a> (of <a href="http://git.lespiau.name/cgit/shave/tree/README">Shave</a> fame) happened to show us all a new Vim command we hadn&#8217;t used before, so I suggested we start a Vim Command of the Day sheet on the other white board. We&#8217;ve taken this into the 21st century as well, so anyone can follow Damien&#8217;s encyclopedic knowledge on Vim through the magic of twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/vcotwdorso">@vcotwdorso</a> (short for, &#8220;vim command of the week day or so&#8221;, because Damien didn&#8217;t want to be restricted to updating it just once a day)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/04/23/vim-command-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear lazy web&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/04/15/dear-lazy-web/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/04/15/dear-lazy-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GNOME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/04/15/dear-lazy-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know what&#8217;s happened to vim&#8217;s &#8220;comment&#8221; feature in Debian Lenny? It seems this feature is enabled (i.e. &#8211;version shows +comment) and the default string set, but it just doesn&#8217;t work. Does any one have any ideas?
Update: many thanks to Lubomir; the answer was that the &#8216;r&#8217; and &#8216;o&#8217; options where missing from formatoptions.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know what&#8217;s happened to vim&#8217;s &#8220;comment&#8221; feature in Debian Lenny? It seems this feature is enabled (i.e. &#8211;version shows +comment) and the default string set, but it just doesn&#8217;t work. Does any one have any ideas?</p>
<p>Update: many thanks to Lubomir; the answer was that the &#8216;r&#8217; and &#8216;o&#8217; options where missing from formatoptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/04/15/dear-lazy-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
