2. What is a good use of time?

I wouldn’t ask people to persuade you that computing is helpful or not– I would determine what I wanted on my own, independently. From there, it should be clear whether computing is part of your vision or not.

The world is separated between those who have power and
those who dont, so long as there are people who are greedy
and care about having power & wealth – those people will be
in power.

However, those who spend their lives building power & wealth
must have missed the point – in life one must have
convictions, joy, pain and share these human experiences…
lest they end up on their mountain of riches looking back
on what they might have actually done with their lives.

The same can be seen to apply to a society as a whole,
what is the meaning/value of being more technologically
advanced than the next nation ?

In reply to Lion:

Yes you hit the nail on the head, its obvious to me that
computing is not a part of my vision, but I’ve been hacking
for so long that its become a crutch – it would also be
interesting to hear about it if anyone on the planet is a
hacker for any reasons that they could share – why THEY
believe that hacking will improve the world – maybe that
would help improve my own vision of the world.

For some its a calling, but either way its like hunting was back in the day. Not that I really know what hunting was like, but I can appreciate the simple joy that a hunter must feel during the hunt. I also can’t think of a direct analogy to hacking, but maybe hunting was/is like debugging. Or rowing a boat, who knows… Its seems like its all about finding meaning in the uphill battle.

The success of any hacking session will be determined entirely on how well you are able to visualize the problem space. It isn’t even about finding a solution, its about creating as complete a map of the problem space in order to go from one blissful state of eureka to another (not sure how that happens, but not sure either how to purposefully trigger eureka moments).

Why do you think some of the poorest nations in the world are also the happiest? Or why the fanatic can be so completely committed to their objective? Its because to them, the problem space is fully mapped. Which isn’t to say they don’t have doubts or fear, but that the only solution is to move forward. The only solution is to be…from one moment to the next with nothing in between. I think enlightenment is when you realize that even moments are full of nothing.

The same way you can express yourself and allow others to realize their potential by observing you break dance, is the same way a hack can express your individuality. A only difference is that computing is available to more people than break dancing. Even grand parents can realize their potential by using an application you hacked together. Maybe they use your jukebox to listen to music they loved as kids, streamed from some corner office in a country where English not the native language, but where music is still universal.

Its hard to measure the full impact that computing has, but at the very least it is changing the way we communicate in part by re-appropriating some of our ancient communication devices (reading, writing).

The countries of the world have alternatives to Microsoft. Doesn’t this give them a stronger, more autonomous position in the world?

New ways grow where things are growing; They do not compete against established powers. If your business is freedom and autonomy, the growing global cybernetic infrastructure is clearly attractive: Better to do your work when things are forming, rather than when they’re actually formed.

Very interesting comments – I dont have enough first hand
experience with third world nations to really say that they
are happier – but I would definitly expect them to be, as
they obviously have better things to do than exploit other
nations for their cheap labor and resources.

I also suppose that computing in general can be seen as
a modern analogy of the postal system or the telephone -
this can be used in positive and negative ways – myspace.com
is a good example of how independant artists can network
together and advertize without the aid of mass media
corporations (which in turn, have their own uses of the
internet & computing world).

One point I’d like to make is that I believe breakdance
is in fact available to more people than computing – it
only takes motivation to breakdance, you are not required
to purchase a piece of hardware or do any dealings with
an isp or anything – to show people that after years of
dedication I’ve managed to accomplish something – is to
show them that they dont need to follow the program or
work for a company who’s ideals do not fit with their
philosophy… in short – many people live under the illusion
that social security is more important than freedom of
expression.

Whether the programmer is essentially useful as a plumber
is useful is debatable, that all depends on whether you
think plumbing or computing are needed in your way of life.
plumbing is obviously a good thing when it comes to living
in large communities such as cities, computing on the other
hand has many negative impacts that go along with some
arguably positive impacts on the world.

Consider that the information that is the internet is a
collective of all sorts of imagined ideas of humanity -
kind of like a huge interactive library… if a monk were
to dedicate their life to the understanding of a library
and always have their nose in the books – thats their
perogative, meanwhile life goes on outside all around us
and every moment spent tinkering with this imaginary world
of our own invention is a moment we could have spent in
real life… a moment that we could have been using the
body that was given us at birth instead of wastefully
throwing it into a comfortable armchair…

I am sorry to express my negative views but this was
really my sentiment when I posted it, I am glad to hear
and share your philosophical views though.