http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2005/12/27/lets-agree-on-nothing-and-everything/ Just another GNOME Blogs weblog Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:23:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2005/12/27/lets-agree-on-nothing-and-everything/#comment-171 Mart Raudsepp Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2005/12/27/lets-agree-on-nothing-and-everything/#comment-171 Just FYI: wxWindows is named wxWidgets these days<br/>(yes, MS tapped on the shoulder after 12 years of ignoring the name and I believe it was even knowingly sponsoring a tad bit in the history) Just FYI: wxWindows is named wxWidgets these days
(yes, MS tapped on the shoulder after 12 years of ignoring the name and I believe it was even knowingly sponsoring a tad bit in the history)

]]> http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2005/12/27/lets-agree-on-nothing-and-everything/#comment-172 Amadeo Lima Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2005/12/27/lets-agree-on-nothing-and-everything/#comment-172 On the other hand, they are discussing common protocols and libraries. Let the market decide what toolkit is best, and improve the interoperation of toolkits. It is impossible to "pick the winner" anyway, as none of the frameworks have more than 30% of the market (ex: java, XUL, gtk, qt, UNO, motif, etc...). The best is to create a flexible way to be able to integrate any toolkit to the linux desktop. On the other hand, they are discussing common protocols and libraries. Let the market decide what toolkit is best, and improve the interoperation of toolkits. It is impossible to “pick the winner” anyway, as none of the frameworks have more than 30% of the market (ex: java, XUL, gtk, qt, UNO, motif, etc…). The best is to create a flexible way to be able to integrate any toolkit to the linux desktop.

]]>