<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The lagging fortunes of XaraLX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/</link>
	<description>GStreamer and Collabora news and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:31:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: André</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>André</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/#comment-894</guid>
		<description>I think not only Pitivi but Thoggen would benefit from predefined output profiles for (mobile) devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think not only Pitivi but Thoggen would benefit from predefined output profiles for (mobile) devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Playlist works fine here, fwiw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playlist works fine here, fwiw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pachi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>pachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/#comment-896</guid>
		<description>It looks like Xara would open source Cdraw/Gdraw, and that it&#039;s part of the great speed claimed for XaraLX. Do you know how that opensourcing is going or whether it&#039;ll take place?.&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve found this thread about the issue quite interesting: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkgraphics.com/showthread.php?t=23440&amp;page=2&quot;&gt;http://www.talkgraphics.com/showthread.php?t=23440&amp;page=2&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Xara would open source Cdraw/Gdraw, and that it&#8217;s part of the great speed claimed for XaraLX. Do you know how that opensourcing is going or whether it&#8217;ll take place?.<br />I&#8217;ve found this thread about the issue quite interesting: <a href="http://www.talkgraphics.com/showthread.php?t=23440&#038;page=2">http://www.talkgraphics.com/showthread.php?t=23440&#038;page=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/#comment-897</guid>
		<description>XaraLX beats Inkscape any time. Not because it has superior features but because it was made by engineers for customers. It wasn&#039;t made by engineers for engineers like Inkscape. I&#039;m exaggerating slightly but this is true. XaraLX has got superior usability for non-expert users and it&#039;s simply more polished. At least I&#039;d love getting it on a default installation of my favorite Linux/FreeBSD flavours...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XaraLX beats Inkscape any time. Not because it has superior features but because it was made by engineers for customers. It wasn&#8217;t made by engineers for engineers like Inkscape. I&#8217;m exaggerating slightly but this is true. XaraLX has got superior usability for non-expert users and it&#8217;s simply more polished. At least I&#8217;d love getting it on a default installation of my favorite Linux/FreeBSD flavours&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralpht</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>ralpht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>My understanding was that Cairo lacked some of the features that Xara requires (I think one of the Xara guys said this; can&#039;t find the reference now). I have wondered if it would be possible to use Anti-Grain Geometry to implement GDraw -- it would be fairly straightforward to get some of the basic functionality going, but there isn&#039;t much documentation on GDraw, so doing a pixel perfect reimplementation probably isn&#039;t reasonably possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding was that Cairo lacked some of the features that Xara requires (I think one of the Xara guys said this; can&#8217;t find the reference now). I have wondered if it would be possible to use Anti-Grain Geometry to implement GDraw &#8212; it would be fairly straightforward to get some of the basic functionality going, but there isn&#8217;t much documentation on GDraw, so doing a pixel perfect reimplementation probably isn&#8217;t reasonably possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>@Christian&lt;p/&gt;There is no such thing as XaraLX anymore. In fact they renamed it to Xara Xtreme for Linux last summer.&lt;p/&gt;@erik&lt;p/&gt;&quot;It wasn&#039;t made by engineers for engineers like Inkscape.&quot; -- you couldn&#039;t be more wrong. Inkscape&#039;s core team includes two professional designers. Please get the facts before you talk, not after.&lt;p/&gt;Just to make sure you really know what you are talking about: &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.inkscape.org:8080/wiki/index.php/Xara_X&quot;&gt;http://wiki.inkscape.org:8080/wiki/index.php/Xara_X&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p/&gt;Please note that I&#039;m by no means against Xara.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Christian
<p />There is no such thing as XaraLX anymore. In fact they renamed it to Xara Xtreme for Linux last summer.
<p />@erik
<p />&#8220;It wasn&#8217;t made by engineers for engineers like Inkscape.&#8221; &#8212; you couldn&#8217;t be more wrong. Inkscape&#8217;s core team includes two professional designers. Please get the facts before you talk, not after.
<p />Just to make sure you really know what you are talking about: <a href="http://wiki.inkscape.org:8080/wiki/index.php/Xara_X">http://wiki.inkscape.org:8080/wiki/index.php/Xara_X</a>
<p />Please note that I&#8217;m by no means against Xara.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoffe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>@Alexandre: Maybe those designers are suffering slightly from a very common ailment in development, namely not seeing misfeatures due to using the program too much. It happens a lot, when you are using and developing a program, you start to subconsciously work around UI problems and even bugs, and stop noticing them altogether. Not saying that this *is* the case, but perhaps Inkscape could benefit from external usability studies from designers with little or no experience in the program. It&#039;s a great program, but I do find it unintuitive at times. Not that I&#039;m a designer. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/#comment-899">Alexandre</a>: Maybe those designers are suffering slightly from a very common ailment in development, namely not seeing misfeatures due to using the program too much. It happens a lot, when you are using and developing a program, you start to subconsciously work around UI problems and even bugs, and stop noticing them altogether. Not saying that this *is* the case, but perhaps Inkscape could benefit from external usability studies from designers with little or no experience in the program. It&#8217;s a great program, but I do find it unintuitive at times. Not that I&#8217;m a designer. <img src='http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/01/31/the-lagging-fortunes-of-xaralx/feed/ ) in 1.34805 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:48 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 11:48 pm UTC -->
