<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The endless Linux ready for the desktop discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/</link>
	<description>GStreamer and Collabora news and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jörg Müller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jörg Müller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/#comment-903</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a truly realistic view!&lt;p/&gt;An alternative desktop is ready for 70% of the &quot;average&quot; desktop users (not gamers) as far as their printers and scanners are supported. With Turboprint, the printer support shouldn&#039;t be a big problem, although that software is not for free. And now, I can buy at least the media codecs that I need. &lt;p/&gt;When I add the prices of the three migration packages that I might need (CrossOver, Turboprint and Media Codecs) it&#039;s still less than a third compared to Vista - a real bargain! &lt;p/&gt;Actually the only obstacles to the breakthrough of the Linux desktop in the mainstream in terms of market share are just _some_ of the drivers. I think it&#039;s only a matter of three to four years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a truly realistic view!
<p />An alternative desktop is ready for 70% of the &#8220;average&#8221; desktop users (not gamers) as far as their printers and scanners are supported. With Turboprint, the printer support shouldn&#8217;t be a big problem, although that software is not for free. And now, I can buy at least the media codecs that I need.
<p />When I add the prices of the three migration packages that I might need (CrossOver, Turboprint and Media Codecs) it&#8217;s still less than a third compared to Vista &#8211; a real bargain!
<p />Actually the only obstacles to the breakthrough of the Linux desktop in the mainstream in terms of market share are just _some_ of the drivers. I think it&#8217;s only a matter of three to four years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Wirzenius</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Wirzenius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>For past couple of years, I&#039;ve wondered exactly how ready Linux/GNOME is for the &quot;average user&quot;. So I did a little experiment: &lt;a href=&quot;http://liw.iki.fi/liw/log/2007-01.html#20070124b&quot;&gt;http://liw.iki.fi/liw/log/2007-01.html#20070124b&lt;/a&gt; (sorry for plugging my own stuff).&lt;p/&gt;Conclusion: except for sysadmin stuff, multimedia, and &quot;toys&quot; (Second Life, etc) explicitly made only for Windows, Debian etch is ready. The experiment was with Debian, but since the same software is available everywhere else it&#039;s in no way restricted to Debian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For past couple of years, I&#8217;ve wondered exactly how ready Linux/GNOME is for the &#8220;average user&#8221;. So I did a little experiment: <a href="http://liw.iki.fi/liw/log/2007-01.html#20070124b">http://liw.iki.fi/liw/log/2007-01.html#20070124b</a> (sorry for plugging my own stuff).
<p />Conclusion: except for sysadmin stuff, multimedia, and &#8220;toys&#8221; (Second Life, etc) explicitly made only for Windows, Debian etch is ready. The experiment was with Debian, but since the same software is available everywhere else it&#8217;s in no way restricted to Debian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefano Canepa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Canepa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>I do think that GNU/Linux with gnome or KDE is ready for the desktop of any user who don&#039;t like to play with PC and who does not need legacy application. I also think that to play it&#039;s better to buy a console and that 90% of legacy applications need to be rewritten and can be rewritten to work on GNU/Linux.&lt;br/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think that GNU/Linux with gnome or KDE is ready for the desktop of any user who don&#8217;t like to play with PC and who does not need legacy application. I also think that to play it&#8217;s better to buy a console and that 90% of legacy applications need to be rewritten and can be rewritten to work on GNU/Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2007/02/01/the-endless-linux-ready-for-the-desktop-discussion/feed/ ) in 0.14047 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 5:48 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 6:48 am UTC -->
