Comments on: Epiphany + Webkit

By: Epiphany » Blog Archive » Epiphany 2.19.6 released; WebKit back-end

Epiphany » Blog Archive » Epiphany 2.19.6 released; WebKit back-end — Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:44:51 +0000

[...] experimental WebKit back-end was added by Xan Lopez during the GNOME conference. Read all about it here. Fer also blogged about it and it was even mentioned in an article on Ars [...]

By: JamesL

JamesL — Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:41:02 +0000

I hope to see this working sooner rather than later, now that the Firefox folks are showing themselves to be a bunch of AHoles. Want to move away from Firefox soon.

By: James Richard Tyrer

James Richard Tyrer — Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:40:49 +0000

Perhaps you mean the integrated File Manager.
All browsers will browse files.

By: James Richard Tyrer

James Richard Tyrer — Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:38:56 +0000

“Konqueror is nice, but I don’t like the integrated Filebrowser”

Perhaps you mean the integreated File _Manager_.
All browsers will browse files.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:47:09 +0000

[...] (

By: rororo

rororo — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:44:08 +0000

I hope that epiphany will get the alternative non-gecko browser that I’ve been waiting for. Konqueror is nice, but I don’t like the integrated Filebrowser.

By: Ubuntu@MacVillage » WebKit auf dem Vormarsch

Ubuntu@MacVillage » WebKit auf dem Vormarsch — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:04:51 +0000

[...] der erfolgreichen Portierung des Epiphany-Browsers auf das WebKit steht nun offenbar eine Reunion von KHTML und WebKit bevor. Logischerweise würde das bedeuten, [...]

By: mpt

mpt — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:32:00 +0000

Bravo!

By: Jakob

Jakob — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:48:00 +0000

This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title o.us poetry. Thanks for informative article

By: Il Magnifico

Il Magnifico — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:42:20 +0000

Part of this blog’s name (“iocane”) it’s not considered a good word here in Florence… LOL